1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Juliette [100K]
3 years ago
12

Workers who are not good team members might cause ______. A. Increased quality b. Reduced management c. Increased self-esteem d.

Reduced productivity Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D
Business
2 answers:
adoni [48]3 years ago
7 0

From the given choices for the question, the best answer would be (C) reduced productivity.

When there is a worker who isn’t a good team member in a group, the productivity of the entire group would be decreased. For example, if the worker doesn’t contribute his or her share of work, that would impact the group’s work tempo in completing the assigned goal.

andrey2020 [161]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

it is D i just took the test

Explanation:

You might be interested in
With its current levels of input use, a firm's MRTS is 1/3 (when capital is on the vertical axis and labor is on the horizontal
bixtya [17]

Answer: A. the firm could produce 3 more units of output if it increased its use of capital by one unit (holding labor constant).

Explanation:

The Marginal Rate of Technical Substitution(MRTS) is calculated as follows:

= Marginal product of labor / Marginal product of capital

= 1 / 3

Marginal product of labor = 1

Marginal product of capital = 3

This means that if one unit of labor is used, it produces 1 unit of output.

If one unit of capital is used however, it produces 3 units of output.

If a firm therefore used one unit of capital and kept labor constant, it could produce 3 units out output.

4 0
2 years ago
Rick Palmer received a $2,500 raise this year. This increased his salary as an associate TV producer from $45,000 to $47,500. Wh
PilotLPTM [1.2K]

Answer: Rick had a 5.55%  nominal salary Increase.

Explanation:  In Finances & Economics , Nominal value is measured in terms of money . This means that the value has not been adjusted against inflation and will only show the "Number Value" rather than the economic value which is how much purchase power this salary increase really means.

The formula to calculate the % for this nominal increase is : (Final Value - Initial Value) / Initial Value * 100 ==>> ($47500-$45000)/$45000 = 0.55 *100 ===> 5.5%

4 0
3 years ago
On June 7, Pixer Co. sells $1500 of merchandise to Jasmine Co. on account. Jasmine Co. pays for this merchandise on June 21. a.
Musya8 [376]

Answer:

a.

Debit Accounts Receivable $1,500

Credit Sales $1,500

b.

Debit Cash $1,500

Credit Accounts Receivable $1,500

Explanation:

On June 7, Pixer Co. sells $1500 of merchandise to Jasmine Co. on account.

Pixer's books records the sale by the entry:

Debit Accounts Receivable $1,500

Credit Sales $1,500

On June 21, Jasmine Co. pays for this merchandise. Pixer's books records the receipt of payment by the entry:

Debit Cash $1,500

Credit Accounts Receivable $1,500

7 0
3 years ago
Purely competitive industry X has constant costs and its product is an inferior good. The industry is currently in long-run equi
jasenka [17]

Answer:

increase in output, but not in the equilibrium price of the product. 

Explanation:

The options weren't provided. The full question can be found here - https://www.chegg.com/homework-help/questions-and-answers/perfectly-competitive-industry-x-constant-costs-product-inferior-good-industry-currently-l-q39354625

An inferior good is a good whose demand increases when income falls and whose demand falls when income rises.

When average income falls, the demand for good X rises. The level of output increases as a result of the rise in demand but price doesn't change.

I hope my answer helps you.

5 0
3 years ago
An individual has $32,000 invested in a stock with a beta of 1.1 and another $48,000 invested in a stock with a beta of 1.3 If t
blagie [28]

Answer:

The beta of the portfolio is 1.22

Explanation:

In calculating the beta of the whole portfolio, we can calculate the weighted average beta of each stock .The sum of all weighted betas give the beta of the entire portfolio.

Beta of portfolio=amounted in first stock/entire amount invested*beta of the first+amount invested in second stock/entire amount invested *beta of the second stock

Beta of portfolio=($32000/($32000+$42000))*1.1+($48000/($32000+$48000))*1.3

Beta of portfolio=1.22

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Lisa purchased a hat for $10, a purse for $20, and a book for $23. The sales tax rate was 7.2 percent. What was the total amount
    11·1 answer
  • When a manufacturing plant uses mathematical models to plan production schedules and to schedule equipment maintenance, it is dr
    6·1 answer
  • Pros and cons on outdoor advertising
    11·1 answer
  • "Free" items only cost the company that gives them away.<br> O A.<br> True<br> OB. False
    11·2 answers
  • On December 31, 2018, Perry Corporation leased equipment to Admiral Company for a five-year period.
    7·1 answer
  • Suppose the market follows a single index model, where the index has standard deviation of 15%. For a stock with firm-specific r
    13·1 answer
  • A certain chicken company decides that it will become the market leader in the poultry business in five years with a 40 percent
    7·1 answer
  • What is journal entry is goods return to sanjay​
    15·1 answer
  • Help asap please:)))!!!
    10·1 answer
  • How did IT help the company solve that problem?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!