The cycle time of this process for the firm is 2.89.
<h3>What is a Cycle Time?</h3>
This refers to the average time between the start of production of one unit and the start of production of the next unit of production
Cycle Time = Net time available to work / Customer demand
Cycle Time = 1.1 + 1.5 / 0.9
Cycle Time = 2.88888888889
Cycle Time = 2.89.
Therefore, the cycle time of this process for the firm is 2.89.
Read more about cycle time
<em>brainly.com/question/18802868</em>
#SPJ1
Answer:
It is given that in an oligopolistic market, there are at first five firms. At the point when the quantity of fums diminishes to three, it implies that the all out yield will likewise decrease. It is on the grounds that, all the makers are delivering separated items. The inventory of merchandise won't increment in light of the fact that the makers would have expanded the creation before, if that was conceivable. Hence, the balance amount will fall and in view of decrease in amount, cost will increase.
Thus, equilibrium price will likely <u>increase</u> and the equilibrium quantity will likely <u>decrease.</u>
Answer:
Real rate of returns are lower than nominal rates of return, therefore, using a real discount rate would overestimate a project's net present value. This could result in unprofitable projects being accepted because the NPV was erroneously calculated. If you want to use a real discount rate, you must first convert cash flows to real dollars.
For example, nominal discount rate is 10%, inflation rate is 5%, real discount rate is 5%.
Initial outlay $100
NCF year 1 = $40
NCF year 2 = $40
NCF year 3 = $40
Using the real discount rate, the NPV = $8.93
Using the nominal discount rate, the NPV = -$0.53
Answer:
$72,200
Explanation:
For computing the amount included in the income statement as an investment we need to applied the equity method which is shown below:
= Earned amount × given percentage
= $361,000 × 20%
= $72,200
We simply multiply the earned amount by Nash with the acquiring percentage i.e 20% so that the amount could come and the same is to be included in the income statement
Answer:
less than $1 million.
Explanation:
According to my research, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this next change is likely to save less than $1 million. We can predict this since the first change saved $1 million but was a reduction of 3%, the second change is a reduction of 2% so it will most likely not reach 1$ million in savings
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
