Answer:
The principle of the Software Engineering Code of Ethics that Gilbert violated is:
Judgement (as related to full disclosure of personal involvement).
Explanation:
Gilbert is required by the Judgement Principle to "disclose those conflicts of interest that cannot reasonably be avoided or escaped." Since Gilbert professionally believes that the software meets specifications, secures documents, and satisfies user requirements, it is not quite apparent if he violated any principle. However, he could have informed his client of his personal interest in the software and also presented other software packages of other companies from which the client could make its independent choice.
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the given case it is valid contract as there is time, promise, benefit and obligation to do thing. But verbal contracts are difficult to prove. Stan and Byron have a verbal contract which is a promise for 10 days and the contract has exchange of goods for $600. Offer is made by Byron but the acceptance is not yet given by Stan.
Here only the offer is made and it is not yet accepted by Byron. here Stan has revoked the offer through letter so the revoke has been communicated to the other party through letter. So in this case there is no breach of contract as the contract was clearly revoked by Stan through his letter.
I think it's called a price ceiling. At least, that's what I think it is.
Answer:
Interest= $90
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Initial investment= $3,000
i= 3%
Number of periods= 1
<u>First, we need to calculate the future value, using the following formula:</u>
FV= PV*(1+i)^n
FV= 3,000*1.03= $3,090
<u>Now, the interest earned:</u>
Interest= 3,090 - 3,000
Interest= $90