Answer:1.At that time, Ireland was in social conditions of overpopulation and uncontrolled poverty. These major issues in the economy of the country prompted Swift to write this satiric proposal.
2.A modern audience would become skeptical in a way that they will see this as an exaggerated means for a solution. However, they will also see the sense of it as they will compare it to the modern era of economic inconsistency and incapability.
3.The fourth could be considered the most sardonic as it greatly hits parents who cannot control themselves from reproducing but cannot produce a life for their child
4.The fourth could be considered the most sardonic as it greatly hits parents who cannot control themselves from reproducing but cannot produce a life for their child
5.Swift's purpose of using a provocative approach is to provoke and evoke emotions and in the process, elicit proper and feasible solutions from the audience.
6.Personally, I don't see it as as Swift's own belief but as his way of enlightening the audience on what is truly happening with women and families.
7.The word "proposal" is very catchy in a way that people always wanted to seek for solutions and ways to answer to a problem but are often tired and lazy to have their own ideas.
8.Swift hoped to bring about awareness and ignite the people to not just observe, but also take the necessary action to make their society a better place to live in.
Explanation: i used slader
Answer:
The different positions of the political party must face each trial they are planning on solving throughout their presidency. The parties both represent different different therefore having a different call on each situation obviously but they represent each party based on the point of view they see each problem in and both parties basically disagree on most things one party might have one point of view on handling systematic racism another can have a different point of view, one position can have a certain opinion about the healthcare system that the other disagrees with, one position can have a certain opinion about Underpaid teachers and Low wage employees and the other can have another. What I am saying here is that both parties have different opinion that will represent their party and most of the time both of the parties/ positions will be in disagreement.
Explanation:
Really?? you will pay me haha ok I try :-)
