Answer:
C because an objective essay should be based on a biast option upon the people.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!!
Horses live to be twenty years old.
(false, horses live 25-32 statistically.)
A. draws conclusions based on premises everyone can agree on.
I would pick this because with inductive you will have a very strong or a very weak argument, whereas deductive reasoning is awesome because, if used correctly, leads to the most agreeable (and logical) solution.
The argument that uses a non sequitur fallacy is C, "Regulations on motorists should be lifted because factories are a bigger source of pollution"
Explanation: Non sequitur fallacy is when the conclusion doesn't follow the premises. That said in different words, the premises is an irrelevant reason to support the conclusion.
So, as true as it is that factories are a bigger source of pollution, the conclusion does not follow from the premises. The fact that regulations on motorists should be lifted, does not necessarily mean that the reason to do that is that factories are a bigger source of pollution.