Answer:
No
Explanation:
In simple words, the trickle down economics actually worsened the situations. The trickle-down hypothesis begins with a reduction in corporate income taxes as well as less regulations.
The administration collects more tax income as a consequence of the broader economic growth—enough to cover the cost of the initial tax reductions for the affluent and businesses.
Answer:
The poor economic conditions in the early 1990s led to a new congressional leadership being elected in 1994.
Explanation:
Due to the severity of poverty during that time period it lead to effectively to various changes including leadership.
Senators are more vulnerable to defeat than their colleagues in the House <span> because Senate candidates are more evenly matched in spending
Money often became a very decisive factor for political candidates for winning the votes through campaigns and advertisement.
Similar spending means that they wouldn't have enough found to out-perform their competitor, which make the senators more prone to losing.</span>
no because it kept poor people in debt and they almost always owed the landowner money for things such as food, clothing, farm supplies, and medicine. It made it hard for poor farmers to save money and provide a good life for their families.
I wish I know that bestie
