Feudalism worked easy because it was a system that worked from top to bottom. At the top you had the King which provided money for the Nobility that provided troops and protection for the king. Then the Nobility would bestow the land to his knights that would give the land to the peasants and they owned the land and farmer on it. The knights would provide military service for food that they farmed.
It seems that you have forgotten the given choices of this question, but anyway, the correct answer would be SUPPORTED AN UNPOPULAR VIEW. <span>According to the Supreme Court, the supporting of an unpopular view, most likely promoted the arrest of the protesters in Edwards v. South Carolina. Hope this is the answer you are looking for. </span>
The correct answer is coexistence
Acculturation is an anthropological and sociological concept that is related to the fusion of elements belonging to two or more cultures.
It is determined by a dynamic process of social and cultural change that takes place through the contact (direct or indirect) between different social groups.
These groups are influenced by different elements, and thus, they create new structures. As an example, we can mention the fusion between Greek and Roman culture that generated Greco-Roman culture.
Remember that culture is a very broad concept that involves knowledge, values, customs, ways of doing, practices, habits, behaviors and beliefs of a specific people. It is not static and is therefore in a continuous process of change.
The case <em>Miranda v. Arizona (1966)</em> was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court in which the court established that prosecutors cannot use a person's statements made in response to interrogation in police custody as evidence at their trial, unless the person was informed of what is known as "Miranda warning," but voluntarily waived these rights.
A "Miranda warning" is an explanation given to people arrested that informs them of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning. It also informs them of the right against self-incrimination before police questioning. The court's ruling protect those accused of a crime because it prevents them from incriminating themselves. It also reminds them of the importance of an attorney for achieving a successful trial.
