Answer:
The difference between the rate law for a reaction and the integrated rate law of a reaction is:
<u>Rate law shows the relationship between the rate of reaction and the concentrations of the reactants. </u>
<u>The integrated rate law is a relationship between the concentration of the reactant and time.</u>
Explanation:
The rate law for a chemical reaction considers the concentration or pressure of the reactants.
The integrated rate law is an equation that consideres the reactants as a function of time.
It is a false statement that the curfew is an unfair limit on their persoanl rights granted by the amendment in the Bill of Rights.
<h3>What is the Bill of Rights?</h3>
This is an first amendment that establish citizen right & liberties from the government authorities.
The right ranges from right to speech, religion, privacy, press, assembly, petition, trial by jury etc.
However, the curfew imposed on the citizen is not an unfair limit on their personal rights because it is intended to protect them from an unseen danger that can occur at night.
Missing words " Residents say it is an unfair limit on their rights. Discuss your position on the issue and include an explanation of how it relates to an amendment in the Bill of Rights.:
Read more about Bill of Rights
<em>brainly.com/question/493206</em>
#SPJ1
Answer:
Products liability laws
Explanation:
These laws govern the responsibility/liability of any or all the parties that participate in the chain of manufacturing a certain product for the damage caused by that product. The parties involved and, therefore, liable are the manufacturer or producer, the wholesaler and the retailer. If a product has certain defects that have caused damage to the consumer, the abovementioned parties may be subject to products liability suits.
Products liability is usually considered a strict liability offense. If the plaintiff evidences that a certain product is defective, the defendant is liable. It is not taken into account whether the manufacturer or provider of the product had intention to cause damage or not, they shall be liable for the damage caused to the plaintiff.
Answer:
can u plz type in english ?..............
