1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vlada-n [284]
3 years ago
12

0:00

History
1 answer:
Brums [2.3K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Freedom of the Press

Explanation:

The US government had been lying to the American people about the Vietnam War - how many soldiers were killed, the strength of the opposing army, our involvemnet in the death of one of South Vietnam's leaders, and some other things.

Maybe the biggest lie was that our leaders, including President Lyndon Johnson, admitted we could probably not win in Vietnam unless we got so aggressive we might start an even bigger war, involving more countries, yet the President and other leaders kept telling the American people that victory could be had if we just kept sending troops.

Also, the US government wanted to get out of the war but were afraid of looking weak. So they kept sending soldiers to die in a war they did not expect to ever win, just to avoid saying they'd made a mistake.

All this information was contained in a report the government commissioned a civilain research company to do. They did the research at the US government's request but the government kept it secret. It was classified, and that meant it was a crime to tell the public about the report or what was in it.

A man named Daniel Ellsberg worked at the research company that did the report. He leaked the information to the press. The New York Times and the Washington Post published parts of the report, and the government threatened to lock them up for revealing government secrets.

The case went to the US Supreme Court. In 1971, in a 6-3 decision, the Court sided with the newspapers. The Court said it could not be allowed that the government could lie to the people and then hide the lie by locking up reporters for telling the truth. (Apparently, the other 3 Justices thought what the government was doing was okay. Conservative judges more frequently side with the government over the Bill of Rights.)

I remember all this because I was 14 years old when it happened, a long time ago. I was born in 1957.

You might be interested in
Describing the most significant parts of a text is known as a source
icang [17]

Answer:

i dont get it what is the question?

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Berlin airlift event almost have led to another crisis
Basile [38]

Answer:

The Berlin Blockade was an attempt in 1948 by the Soviet Union to limit the ability of the United States, Great Britain and France to travel to their sectors of Berlin, which lay within Russian-occupied East Germany. 

In June 1948, the simmering tensions between the Soviet Union and its former allies in World War II, exploded into a full-blown crisis in the city of Berlin. Alarmed by the new U.S. policy of giving economic aid to Germany and other struggling European nations, as well as efforts by the Western Allies to introduce a single currency to the zones they occupied in Germany and Berlin, the Soviets blocked all rail, road and canal access to the western zones of Berlin. Suddenly, some 2.5 million civilians had no access to food, medicine, fuel, electricity and other basic goods. 

6 0
3 years ago
Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the Shah of Iran, was the main leader in Iran until 1979. What happened in 1979 that removed Pahlavi from
inna [77]

Answer:

In 1979, the Iranian Revolution occured that removed the Shah from power.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Which of the following revoked recognition of Native American tribes as independent nations? Indian Appropriations Act of 1871 I
zheka24 [161]
Indian Appropriations Act of 1871
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the kansas-nebraska act cause more violence?
anyanavicka [17]

Answer:

Deciding whether a territory would allow slavery or not based on a vote of the people in the territories led to slavery supporters and abolitionists both rushing to the region in order to vote on the issue.  This led to an outbreak of violence between the settlers.

Explanation:

The Kansas-Nebraska Act was enacted by Congress in 1854. It granted popular sovereignty to the people in the Kansas and Nebraska territories, letting them decide whether they'd allow slavery.  In essence, this made the Kansas-Nebraska act a repeal of the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had said there would be no slavery north of latitude 36°30´ except for Missouri.

After the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers rushed into Kansas to try to sway the outcome of the issue, and violence between the two sides occurred.  The term "bleeding Kansas" was used because of the bloodshed.  

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Germans executed bombing raids for 57 days but were unable to crush the morale of
    6·1 answer
  • What is an example of a cause and effect relationship that caused conflict between Parliament and the American colonies?
    11·2 answers
  • What brought wealth to the axum and great Zimbabwe kingdoms?
    14·1 answer
  • The germans began to retreat from the soviet union after fierce fighting at which city?
    10·2 answers
  • How many members are in the state house
    5·1 answer
  • 13. In a representative government, people elect delegates to make laws and
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following Is an effect of NAFTA as seen on the chart A) The creation of the united states dominated trade system. B
    12·1 answer
  • “Any alliance whose purpose is not the intention to wage war is senseless and
    12·1 answer
  • If the nova 6 came out of a hole how would we not get killed
    7·1 answer
  • What was the name of the new style of warfare during world war 1? quizziz.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!