Find a counterexample to disprove the statement "The Associative Property is true for division."

Mathematics

1 answer:

MaRussiya [10]4 years ago

5 0

The associative property makes it so whichever which way the numbers are the answer will be the same but as shown in the picture this isn't true for this statement because the answers become completely different depending on where the numbers are in the equation.
6 divided by 3 is NOT equal to 3 divided by 6 which disproves that property.

You might be interested in

deenas water bottle can hold a total of 2/5 liter of water. johns water bottle can hold a total of 5/2 liter of water whose wate

Alexandra [31]

John's. Find the first common multiple of both denominators, in this case it's going to be ten, then the number you had to multiply to change these numbers to the common multiply you do to the numerators. so it works out like so:

Deena has a bottle of 4/10
John has a bottle of 25/10 or 2 1/2 (simplified)

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

For the people who helped me with the question

erik [133]

Answer:

glad my answer helped you.

Step-by-step explanation:

hope that because i showed the steps, it will help you if you come across a problem like that in the future too!

4 0

2 years ago

Es algo tonto pero no tengo tiempo como se escribe en numero Un millón cuarenta y cinco mil cuatrocientos veinte