Answer:
The correlation between a tax rate of zero percent, and a tax rate of 100% is that in both cases the government would collect exactly zero taxes.
Explanation:
The reason for this at the 0% rate is self-explanatory: if the government does not impose any taxes, it will obviously collect zero tax revenue.
However, the explanation for this case at the 100% is a bit more elaborate. At a 100% tax rate, incentives to work and earn income would radically change. In other words, people would have no incentive to do so because the government would charge a tax for 100% of their income. For this reason, they would either abandon employment, or find ways to avoid the tax. This would eventually result in zero tax revenue for the government.
In my opinion I feel we have to much responsibility but we need it to keep our country safe and other countries should abide by what the governments is making them do because it’s to keep us safe.
Answer:
This statement is false.
Explanation:
Overhead allocation is used to distribute resources indirect costs to revenue-producing projects. You can calculate overhead allocation by adding indirect labor and expenses. Thus, you can not just use activity-based costing to calculate overhead allocation.
In my opinion, Americanization can be both good and bad for
young adolescents. It can help them become independent but it can also cause
major issue with culture. The US had been the home of many cultures. There is a
possibility that many of these adolescents might forget their cultural
traditions and practices because they are more used to being American.
This term came about at around 1854 (i want to say around that time period) and was resulted in political differences in the United States when we were abolishing slavery and how Kansas was contemplating on being a slave state of a free state. Many Antislavery people and Pro-slavery people clashed about this resulting in the spill of blood after the Kansas and Nebraska act (1854).
