The total labor year cost increase is 15,000
Answer:
5
Step-by-step explanation:
this means it'll be $55
Answer:
B.
Step-by-step explanation:
Not another one! ;)
A can be eliminated because the numbers don‘t match. B seems like a possible answer, let’s first check the others out. C and D can be slim instead because the variable, g, should be next to the 1.5 and 2.5. C and D both change the variable location. So, B.
5) The relation between intensity and current appears linear for intensity of 300 or more (current = intensity/10). For intensity of 150, current is less than that linear relation would predict. This seems to support the notion that current will go to zero for zero intensity. Current might even be negative for zero intensity since the line through the points (300, 30) and (150, 10) will have a negative intercept (-10) when current is zero.
Usually, we expect no output from a power-translating device when there is no input, so we expect current = 0 when intensity = 0.
6) We have no reason to believe the linear relation will not continue to hold for values of intensity near those already shown. We expect the current to be 100 for in intensity of 1000.
8) Apparently, times were only measured for 1, 3, 6, 8, and 12 laps. The author of the graph did not want to extrapolate beyond the data collected--a reasonable choice.
From the relation, d is joint proportionaly with r and t.
Thus,d = krt.
Using the first set of given, we could calculate for k.135 = k(45)(3)k = 1
Using the computed value of k.d = krtr = d/ktr = (189)/(1)(3.5) = 54 mph.
I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!
