I believe the answer is: Gemeinschaft; Gesellschaft
In english language, Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft would be translated as 'community and society'. Tonnies used this term to differentiate social ties into two types. Community exist based on personal ties (such as similar hobbies, favourites, etc), and society exist based on formal ties ( such as law/regulations).
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
Based on the answers provided it can be said that one of the ways that people have adapted to weather conditions is by building houses along the cost that are built on poles to avoid high water from hurricanes. We can say this is the answer because it explains an adaptation to combat adverse weather effects in a certain area. The other options listed do not depend on weather conditions but more on geographical conditions of the land.
Answer:
Explanation:
I plan on powering homes in Nigeria with the use of wireless solar power , which is very much achievable. I am a research engineer at pragro technology, I am a lead engineer in this project but I don't have both the qualification to head the project and the technical understanding needed to achieve this project.
That is why I want to study at Oklahoma university for my masters. During the cause of my research, I came across, Dr. Ali imran, he has wide experience in the field of wireless communication,also Dr Theodor rulnoffson , his research area has always been on complex power systems and renewable energy, I want to work with these two professors, I will take some courses ,both at practical level with this professor for me to have a good understanding of the project I want to achieve in Nigeria. I already have an idea of wireless communication I was able to power a DC bulb without the use of wires during my undergraduate days. So I shouldn't have a problem while working with this professors. I believe if I can get my masters and also the technical understanding of from this professors, I can head the wireless power transfer in Nigeria because I will be fully loaded with technical knowledge and qualification for the project.
Answer and Explanation:
The Constitution itself establishes a representative democracy, or republic, not a pure democracy. In that sense, I guess you could say it's "undemocratic," although that word seems to have connotations about the electoral process that aren't exactly accurate.
The framers of the Constitution were very concerned about a majority rule changing fundamental laws. While they made the Constitution a flexible document that provided for the possibility of amending, it is an extremely laborious task to do so. The idea is that no temporary majority can significantly affect the rights and protections of the citizenry.
To a large extent, that changed with one critical writing. In 1905, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. wrote the dissent in Lochner v. New York which established the concept of an "empty Constitution." That means that the prevailing legal theory to this day is that the Constitution does not in fact establish *anything* and in lieu of judicial precedent, the will of the people at any snapshot in time is effectively law. This is typically a leftist judicial outlook.
One of the biggest ironies of this decision is making it's way through the appellate courts right now: the California Prop 8 issue. Of course the leftists (rightfully) side with those who support gay marriage. However, if the case is to be decided in their favor, i.e. that a majority cannot vote away someone's right, it will be a repudiation of Holmesian doctrine. If the courts uphold the Holmesian standard, they will be forced to rule that the popular vote can, in fact, restrict rights of the people--in this case, the first amendment right of freedom of association.
