Answer:
Explanation:
The scope of private property rights in the United States has been greatly reduced during the 20th century. Much of the reduction occurred episodically, as governmental officials took control of economic affairs during national emergencies—mainly wars, depressions, and actual or threatened strikes in critical industries. Derogations from private rights that occurred during national emergencies often remained after the crises had passed. A “ratchet” took hold. People adjusted first their actions, then their thinking, to accommodate themselves to emergency governmental controls. Later, lacking the previous degree of public support, private property rights failed to regain their pre-crisis scope.
Emergency restrictions of private property rights are by no means of concern only to historians of the growth of governmental power. Today, emergency restrictions limit many private rights, and many more sweeping restrictions could be lawfully imposed at the President’s discretion. The possibility is real. Like several presidents before him, Ronald Reagan has dipped repeatedly into the government’s reservoir of emergency economic powers. The potential exists for the greatly expanded use—and abuse—of such powers.
I think it’s the first one
Answer:
in both cases the flyer was presented to the barber before the service was provided.
a) no, because Karl was informed about the mistake and the real price and could then still have decided to take his business elsewhere. but if he then agreed to still have the service performed under the now updated conditions, then that is what the "contract" is basing on.
he has no grounds to claim the other price afterwards.
b) no, because the service provider saw the flyer information, did not object to or correct the information right away, but performed the service instead. now the "contract" is based on that agreement based on the conditions of the flyer.
Answer:
This deduction, created by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, allows non-corporate taxpayers to deduct up to 20 percent of their QBI, plus 20% of qualified real estate investment trust (REIT) dividends and qualified publicly traded partnership (PTP) income.Jul 16, 2019
Explanation:
or 2018, the threshold amount is $315,000 for a married couple filing a joint return, and $157,500 for all other taxpayers. The SSTB limitations don't apply for taxpayers with taxable income at or below the threshold amount.This new deduction is equal to 20% of a taxpayer's “qualified business income” (QBI). QBI is calculated by netting the total amount of qualified income, gain, deduction and loss from any qualified trade or business. ... Capital gains and losses, certain dividends and interest income are some of the excluded items.Apr 2, 2019Section 199A defines a qualified trade or business by exclusion; every trade or business is a qualified business other than: The trade or business of performing services as an employee, and. A specified service trade or business.
Answer:
well the question is is it a state bill or federal congress? also i dont have all the facts, but one kid did a bill on how we need to fund an iron man project.
pick something youre passionate about or you wont score well i garuntee it. and whatever you do, DONT DO A BILL ABOUT GETTING RID OF PENNIES, ELIMINATING DAYLIGHT SAVINGS TIME, OR CONVERTING AMERICA TO THE METRIC SYSTEM. LITERALLY EVERYBODY DOES THAT. your teacher will cry.
