Answer:
B. - 5.71%
Explanation:
Given that
Purchase price = 1000 × 35 = 35000
Selling price = 1100 × 30 = 33000
Recall that
ROI = Net profit/total investment × 100
And that
Net profit = selling price - purchase price
= 33000 - 35000
= -2000
Therefore,
ROI = -2000/35000 × 100
= - 0.05714 × 100
= - 5.71 %
Thus, total return on investment is -5.71%
Red yellow and blue because when they are all moved at a high speed they combine to make white
Based on the fact that ActioNOW and Becca entered into an oral contract where Becca agrees to work on a project for ActioNOW for eighteen months, the enforcers of this contract are d. none of the choices.
<h3>Who can enforce this contract?</h3>
This transaction between Becca and ActioNOW was an oral contract which means that it falls under the Statute of Frauds. However, for an oral contract to be enforceable under this Statute, the goods or services exchanged have to be less then $500 in value.
The services or goods also have to be less than 1 year in duration. Because Becca and ActioNow agreed for a contract of 18 months which is more than a year, this contract is not enforceable under the Statute of Frauds and so the government cannot enforce this contract.
Options include:
- a. ActioNOW.
- b. Becca.
- c. any third party, such as ActioNOW’s clients.
- d. none of the choices
Find out more on the Statute of Frauds at brainly.com/question/14854791
#SPJ1
False. A great example would be North Korea compared to the United States. In the United States we have the Freedom to Speech so we also have the the opportunity for news and social media where you can post pretty much anything. North Korea on the other hand lacks informing their own people and their own people lacks a stable and healthy government. We don’t know a lot about North Korea and they don’t know anything at all about us or the rest of the world.
