All categories

3 years ago

Help me please >.< It would help a lot

Mathematics

2 answers:

ExtremeBDS [4]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

8/32

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the numerator, you must divide 100 by 32 which equals 3.125. And whatever you do to the bottom you must do to the top, so 25 divided by 3.125 is 8

I hope this helps ;)

Illusion [34]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

if 25 is a quarter of 100, divide 32 by 4 and you get your answer

You might be interested in

Divide x to the 1 half power divided by x to the 2 sevenths power.

juin [17]

$\frac{x^\frac{1}{2} }{x^\frac{2}{7}}$

According to the rule of exponents $\frac{a^m}{a^n} = a^{(m-n)}$ , i.e. when two terms are in division with same base , we subtract the exponents

$\frac{x^\frac{1}{2} }{x^\frac{2}{7}} = x^{(\frac{1}{2}) - (\frac{2}{7})}$

$=x^\frac{3}{14}$

x to the 3 fourteenths power

5 0

3 years ago

Help please i rlly need it

jonny [76]

The answer is C.7/3 pi ft lmk if you want more answers

8 0

3 years ago

Rachel's free throw average for basketball is 60%. She wants to predict how many times in the next 50 tries she will make a free

Gnoma [55]

If she shot her average she would make 30 out of 50 shots (AKA 60%)
She could use the index cards to record each shot, recording 5 results on each one of the 10 cards

I understand this answer is really late for you but I hope you can still use it or someone else can use it if they have the same assignment

5 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Offering 20 points for this one need asap

kirill115 [55]

Answer:

y = 3x+.5

Step-by-step explanation:

We know the y intercept (the value when x=0) is .5

We can find the slope from 2 points

(0,.5) and (1,3.5)

m = (y2-y1)/ (x2-x1)

= (3.5-.5)/(1-0)

= 3/1

= 3

We can use y = mx+b since we know the slope and the y intercept

y = 3x+.5

5 0

4 years ago

A sample of 1500 computer chips revealed that 32% of the chips do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The company's p

Grace [21]

Answer:

Yes, we have sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level to support the company's claim.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that a sample of 1500 computer chips revealed that 32% of the chips do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The company's promotional literature claimed that above 29% do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use.

Let Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : p $\leq$ 0.29 {means that less than or equal to 29% do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_1$ : p > 0.29 {means that more than 29% do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use}

The test statics that will be used here is One-sample proportions test;

T.S. = $\frac{\hat p -p}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} } }$ ~ N(0,1)

where, $\hat p$ = proportion of chips that do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use = 32%

n = sample of chips = 1500

So, <u>test statistics</u> = $\frac{0.32-0.29}{\sqrt{\frac{0.32(1-0.32)}{1500} } }$

= 2.491

<em>Now, at 0.02 level of significance the z table gives critical value of 2.054. Since our test statistics is more than the critical value of z so we have sufficient evidence to reject null hypothesis as it fall in the rejection region.</em>

Therefore, we conclude that more than 29% do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use which means we have sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level to support the company's claim.

7 0

4 years ago