End behavior: f. As x -> 2, f(x) -> ∞; As x -> ∞, f(x) -> -∞
x-intercept: a. (3, 0)
Range: p. (-∞, ∞)
The range is the set of all possible y-values
Asymptote: x = 2
Transformation: l. right 2
with respect to the next parent function:

Domain: g. x > 2
The domain is the set of all possible x-values
You would use 72/9 , ( division ).
Answer:

Since the angle between the two vectors is not 180 or 0 degrees we can conclude that are not parallel
And the anfle is approximately 
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case first we need to calculate the dot product of the vectors, and after this if the dot product is not equal to 0 we can calculate the angle between the two vectors in order to see if there are parallel or not.
a=[1,2,-2], b=[4,0,-3,]
The dot product on this case is:

Since the dot product is not equal to zero then the two vectors are not orthogonal.
Now we can calculate the magnitude of each vector like this:


And finally we can calculate the angle between the vectors like this:

And the angle is given by:

If we replace we got:

Since the angle between the two vectors is not 180 or 0 degrees we can conclude that are not parallel
And the anfle is approximately 
If it was one year it would be 2200 and you just keep adding 200 for each year.
Answer:
During the year 2021.
Step-by-step explanation:
As we have a function that defines the annual per capita out-of-pocket expenses for health care, we can work with it.
Knowing that, <u>we clear x</u> (<em>this is the number of years past the year 2000, so it will contain our desired information</em>).

Now, as we want to know when are the per capita out-of-pocket expenses for health care predicted to be $1400, and <em>this total is our variable y</em>, then

Finally, we know that <u>x is the number of years past the year 2000</u>, so the answer is that during the year 2021, <em>the per capita out-of-pocket expenses for health care are predicted to be $1400</em>.