In logic, arguments aren't described as true, rather, arguments are used to prove the validity of something.
If the Federal Government were able to regulate commerce within a state, there would possibly be a <u>clash of interests</u>.
<h3>
Trade within a
State</h3>
The United States was formed in such a way that there was an internal state government and a federal government that could implement general policies of common application.
Since the federal government has a different view of trade than the state does, an inclusion of the federal government would cause a <u>clash of interests</u> due to the different views among them.
If you want to learn more about Federal Government, you can visit the following link: brainly.com/question/371257
The Mississipi River is a very important river to the United States. It is a major source of water for many towns and cities alongside it. Even though it is a significant source of water for crops and families, it sometimes is too much water. The Mississipi River floods frequently in the spring now more than ever. <u>Climate change</u> is bringing more rain, which brings more water to the river. This is one of the main causes that humans are creating for the river. <u>This destroys crops, homes, land, and even animals. This destroys land that could have been used for new buildings, habitats for animals, and cropland.</u> The flooding grows more and more each year with more and more rain. <u>This is caused mainly by the Climate Change of our Earth, and the main cause for Climate Change, is us.</u>
the internal validity is still manipulated by the researcher and the DV is measured.
The DV is a variable that is being measured/observed, whereas the IV is a variable that is altered to see how it impacts something else. The term "dependent" refers to the idea that the IV will have an impact on the DV.
<h3>What parallels exist between studies conducted in a lab and those conducted in the field?</h3>
Since experiments are the only way to reliably establish causality, laboratory and field experiments are comparable in that they are both helpful in determining cause and effect. Furthermore, because there is a high level of control over confounding variables, the two experiment designs have the potential to have high internal validity.
Learn more about internal validity:
brainly.com/question/15704269
#SPJ4
