<span>Rivers linked the Byzantines to the Russians. Trade occurred between the two cultures, so the Russians got supplies and ideas they would not have otherwise gotten.Trade brought Kiev into the Byzantine's influence. Also, the Byzantines had a strong hand in the Eastern Orthodox church, which converted Slavs via missionaries.</span>
The economy in the United States in the 1920's varied greatly from European countries. After WWl, Europe struggled to rebuild. Europe had taken the brunt of the attacks and went into a deep depression. The United States in contrast boomed. The economy was better than ever before. Since no attacks had happened on American soil, we were able to mass produce consumer goods, etc. People were buying on credit, investing in the stock market, and moving to the city. Life was good in America; not so good in Europe.
A: they freed the slaves who converted to Islam.
Use the process of elimination. It would be illegal in Muslim law to have children with slaves unless you married them, so C would not be an option.
Native Americans were not in Asia, so neither is D.
Muslims don't believe in forcing religions upon others, and it wouldn't make sense to force Christianity upon someone when you're not Christian, so B is not an option.
A is the answer.
The sharia law states:
Free Muslims, but note that:
Slaves who convert to Islam are not automatically freed
Children born to legally enslaved Muslims are also slaves
This means a slave who converted to Islam would be freed, but not automatically.
Answer:
multinationalism
Explanation:
the reason being the fact that Russia, being its own ethnic area with only the government taking over all of its operations, is directly opposed to multinationalism, as it collides with the main ideology of Russia: communism, as communism means that each fund, and basically EVERYTHING is controlled by the government, particularly RUSSIA'S government. multinationalism opposes that, and so Russian leaders do not agree on the reality of multinationalism
