On questions like these regarding ethical issues, you should consider both the for and against arguments. Your ending conclusion does not matter as long as you show that you’ve considered both sides of the argument. For example, you could say that it’s not right because it is an invasion of privacy and that the drugs aren’t used intentionally to enhance performance or to lead to bias like in athletic competition. However it can be appropriate because use of drugs is illegal. The use of it can lead to dangers to one’s wellbeing and since it occurred at work where machinery might be in use, the workplace can be taken to be responsible for failing to take care of employees. And then conclude it with whether you feel it is right or wrong.
Schemas are used to categorize information and draw conclusions, based on patterns and the relationships between them. In this case, you see your new roommate looking and behaving the way we believe an intellectual person would and you automatically assume that he/she is intellectual.
There are no statements given however a centriole is made up of microtubules triplets in a 9+0 pattern (I am unsure of what level of depth is required)
<span>The answer is 4 . The population will begin to decrease to depletion of resources and increased competition. This will cause an increase in death rate of the paramecium population as compared to birth rate. This phase follows the latent phase where the population remains the same over time as the population reaches carrying capacity and the birth rate equals death rate</span>
