1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lesechka [4]
3 years ago
11

How did American imperialism differ from European imperialism?

History
2 answers:
Svet_ta [14]3 years ago
6 0

America needed new markets for its goods, not a source of raw materials for industries.

-GradPoint

malfutka [58]3 years ago
5 0
The US was the most productive country in the world. It produced many things and needed to sell them.
You might be interested in
How does the trial by jury protect a citizens freedom?
Elena L [17]

Answer:

The founding fathers included jury trials in the constitution, because jury trials prevent tyranny. The definition of tyranny is oppressive power applied by the government. Tyranny also exists when absolute power is established by a single ruler. Jury trials are the opposite of tyranny because the citizens of the jury are given the absolute power to make the final decision on a trial.

Explanation:

Trial by jury is a unique part of America’s democracy. Most countries do not have jury trials. Jury trials provide an opportunity for citizens to participate in the process of governing. Jury trials educate jurors about the justice system.  

Jury trials offer the voice of the people to the civil and criminal justice systems. If you are accused of a crime, you have the right to ask for a jury to judge if you are guilt or innocence. In a civil case, a jury of citizens will determine community standards and expectations in accordance with the law. It is not fair for judges and lawyers to take every important decision; they are not representative of the people. Juries provide the voice of common sense and the perspective of the citizens.

6 0
3 years ago
What was the outcome of the Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education case?
Lelu [443]

Answer:

Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, case in which, on April 20, 1971, the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously upheld busing programs that aimed to speed up the racial integration of public schools in the United States. In 1954 the Supreme Court ruled in Brown v.

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A. ¿Por qué se intentaba entre los años 1800 hasta 1900 evitar una especie de colonialismo a Latinoamérica?
Len [333]

Answer:

Me hiciste pensar que esta era la respuesta. Anda hace tu tarea

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Why are monopolies bad for business? ​
Montano1993 [528]

Answer:

I would probably say the second choice but... definetly not the first option.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
5. According to Adam Smith, how are the
Pie

Answer:

good

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • why does mandela reference other nobel peace prize recipients and how does this contribute to the power of his speech
    10·2 answers
  • After World War 2, many countries believed in the principle of collective security which means that ____.
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is false?
    12·2 answers
  • Summaries of the reforms Mao Zedong proposed for China that could be placed on a propaganda poster
    13·1 answer
  • What did the Russian and Chinese revolutions share in common with the French Revolution?
    6·1 answer
  • Many of us can recognize an act of terrorism when we see it. In reality, terrorism is hard to define. Which BEST explains why th
    14·1 answer
  • Thinking back to Woodrow Wilson's speech in 1914, does the US involvement in Korea show that the US was trying to "make the worl
    13·1 answer
  • Please answer these to blanks for me thank youuu
    5·1 answer
  • A way people organize in order to create order, leadership and security:
    12·1 answer
  • Help i will mark brainliest
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!