1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
satela [25.4K]
3 years ago
6

Why did the North's views on slavery change over time?

History
1 answer:
Vladimir79 [104]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Most white northerners viewed blacks as inferior. Northern states severly limited the rights of free African Americans and discouraged or prevented the migration of more. There was a minority of northerners called abolitionists who were vocal about ending slavery.

Explanation:

brainz

You might be interested in
Question 12 Unsaved In the Sumerian civilization, the purpose of a ziggurat was to Question 12 options: hold back floodwaters. k
Helga [31]
The answer is b to keep the gods and goddesses happy because it was built as a shrine
4 0
3 years ago
What items did traders sell to America Indians in exchange for furs
yan [13]
They trade coins I think I’m not sure
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did slave labor in the Southern colonies differ from that in the Middle and New England colonies? (4 points)
bekas [8.4K]

Answer:

the southern colonies had more slave labor because of cash crops

6 0
3 years ago
A _______ is when one party controls the House and another party controls the Senate.
lora16 [44]

Answer:

- divided government

Explanation:

It is said that there is a divided government when the party that controls the presidency does not have an absolute majority in both houses of Congress. Conversely, it can be said that the unified government exists when the party of the president has an absolute majority in both Houses. Therefore, the relations between the Executive and Legislative powers can become conflictive or cooperative, which has effects on governance.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is destruction of property a legitimate and acceptable form of protest? Why or why not?<br> yes
Ivahew [28]

Answer:

No it is not, it is one thing to protest, that is okay, but burning buildings destroying property, is a little over the top.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who was baldassare castiglione and why is he famous?
    12·2 answers
  • The supreme court case Marbury v . Madison took place during jefferson's presidency .this landmark case established what power o
    6·1 answer
  • What is a treaty?
    8·2 answers
  • What were the consequences of crossing over the berlin wall
    6·2 answers
  • What were the major difficulties in uniting ancient greeks under a single government were caused?
    11·1 answer
  • Why was the development of an alphabet an important advancement for the Phoenician civilization
    9·1 answer
  • How are individualism and populism reflected in American government?
    10·2 answers
  • Individuals, cultures, societies, and the world change through times of -------- and cooperation. 1.conflict, 2.peace,3. trade
    10·1 answer
  • According to the graph, which of these areas represented less than 50,000 of the colonists?
    15·1 answer
  • Why did the Federalists urge ratification of the Constitution? Hurry!!!!!!
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!