1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
liubo4ka [24]
3 years ago
7

Two students conduct the same experiment, but they get different results. What should the students do next? A. The students shou

ld check their procedure and tools for sources of error. B. Both students should throw out their data and start over. C. The students should compare data with other students and then use the data from the student who was closest to the rest of the class. D. The students should find the average of each data set and each report the average data.
Biology
2 answers:
Dvinal [7]3 years ago
8 0

Hey there!

Let's solve your problem:

The answer is: A

If two students do the same experiment, but get different results, they should not throw it away. It may be a phenomenon and they both got different results. They should not compare to the rest of the class either. Finding the average of the data would not help either. The answer is A

Lesechka [4]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

D is the answer

Explanation:

hope it helps

You might be interested in
Hydrogen bonding accounts for which of water's properties? Click all that
Semmy [17]

Answer:

Option <u>(f) : Expansion of water when it freezes</u>

3 0
3 years ago
What is living things and non-living things and non-living things ​
Aleks04 [339]

Answer:

All living things breathe, eat, grow, move, reproduce and have senses. Non-living things do not eat, grow, breathe, move and reproduce. They do not have senses.

Explanation:

brainliest ?

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Extinction is the dying out of a species. What can
Svetllana [295]

Answer:

O

Explanation:

O having traits that enable the spices to adapt to the changed enviroment

5 0
3 years ago
Which is not a likely economic tool to address environmental issues?
Elden [556K]

Explanation:

Policy-makers have two broad types of instruments available for changing consumption and production habits in society. They can use traditional regulatory approaches (sometimes referred to as command-and-control approaches) that set specific standards across polluters, or they can use economic incentive or market-based policies that rely on market forces to correct for producer and consumer behavior. Incentives are extensively discussed in several EPA reports

Two basic types of traditional regulatory approaches exist. The first, a technology or design standard, mandates specific control technologies or production processes that polluters must use to meet an emissions standard. The second, a performance-based standard, also requires that polluters meet an emissions standard, but allows the polluters to choose any available method to meet that standard. Performance-based standards that are technology-based, for example, do not specify a particular technology, but rather consider what available and affordable technologies can achieve when establishing a limit on emissions. At times, EPA may completely ban or phase out the use or production of a particular product or pollutant, as it has done with chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and certain pesticides. Regulations can be uniform or can vary according to size of the polluting entity, production processes, or similar factors. Regulations are often tailored in this manner so that similar regulated entities are treated equally. MARK AS BRAINLIEST IF IT HELPS

4 0
3 years ago
Which statements describe planetesimals? Select three options. They are the origins of planets. They formed from gas and dust. T
Anika [276]

A solid minute object that is said to come together for the formation of the planet and are believed to produce cosmic dust are called planetesimal.

The options that best describes the planetesimals are:

  • Option A. They are the origins of planets.

  • Option B. They formed from gas and dust.

  • Option D. They are believed to have developed in debris disks.

The descriptions can be explained as:

  • It is believed that planets formation occurred through planetesimals. The formation happened from gas, dust particles and debris.

  • By the process of accretion, the discs coalesced and became bigger and solid over time. This bigger mass started attracting other matters towards each other because of gravitational force.

  • This pull resulted in either breaking or creation a bigger mass of pieces known as planetesimals. The collision continued to become bigger and solid planets we know today.

Therefore, options A, B and D are correct.

To learn more about planetesimals refer to the link:

brainly.com/question/10337322

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • All of the following conditions in Earth can cause metamorphic rocks to form EXCEPT ____.
    7·2 answers
  • The focus of _____ was to uncover the elements of the mind, while _____ focused on identifying what thoughts, feelings, and beha
    5·1 answer
  • Which best describes a scientific theory?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following parts of the eye is located at the back of the eye, receives focused light waves from the lens, and is co
    7·2 answers
  • You're conducting an experiment to determine the effect of different wavelengths of light on the absorption of carbon dioxide as
    6·1 answer
  • What causes cyclones to rotate counter-clockwise in the northern hemisphere and clockwise in the southern hemisphere?
    9·1 answer
  • 1. All of these things are true about a theory except for..
    11·1 answer
  • If a forest has many large trees with lots of leaves, what will most likely be found on the ground?
    10·1 answer
  • A cylinder has a radius of 3 and a height of 5 what is the volume of the cylinder
    9·1 answer
  • What happens to a species if an environment changes and there are no variation
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!