1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oksana_A [137]
3 years ago
10

HELP ASAP What would you need to consider when making choices with limited means? set goals or create a budget or Prioritize bet

ween needs and wants or All of the above or none of the above
Law
1 answer:
Kitty [74]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: All of the above

Explanation:

The limited means when a person is experiences scarcity of money and finance to meet all the daily routine demands and needs. With limited means person should be aware about the goals and must prioritize them. The basic needs must be given priority over other demands and wants as they are main demands of the routine life. For example, grocery is the main requirement of the every day life as food is the main ingredient for survival so people even in limited means try to contribute major part of their budget to avail grocery.

You might be interested in
What are some possible negative issues with the M'Naghter Rule? Select all that apply.
koban [17]

Answer:

A. Fails to distinguish between violent defendants and one that no longer pose a danger to society.

C. Fails to differentiate between mental illness that are temporary or lifelong conditions.

Explanation:

M'Naghten Rule is an insanity defense used by defendant's attorney to plead defendant not guilty of crime due to mental conditions suffered during the time crime committed.

M'Naghten Rule states that a defendant will be pleaded not guilty only under conditions when it will be proved that the mental condition of defendant was not right at the time when crime was committed and that he/she was not able to discern his/her actions as right or wrong.

The criticism received to the M'Naghten rule is that it fails to distinguish between defendants who pose threat to the society and those who do not pose threat any longer. Another criticism is that it fails to distinguish between mental illness that are temporary or conditions which are lifelong.

Therefore, option A and C are correct.

6 0
3 years ago
1. Is Defensible Space Theory a logical explanation for controlling crime? Why or why not?
Kaylis [27]

Answer:

See explaination

Explanation:

1. The Defensible Space Theory can really be seen as a logical explanation for controlling crime from the perspectives of a defender as well as an attacker. This theory makes use of the science of psychology with the science of meaningful space. When the defender, that is, the home owners will be responsible for their home space, the sense of responsibility will be higher on the same. The home owners will be accountable for their defense. This encourages home owners to design their home space in such a way that they will be able to control their environment based on their present capabilities like family structure, income level, and socioeconomic status. The attacker, that is, the potential criminal will feel insecure and uncomfortable on a highly defended land. So, the probability of the criminal attacking the home space or neighborhood may be lessened. This argument is supported by the study which involved private homes in two high-crime areas in St. Louis. These areas recorded lower crimes than public areas using the Defensible Space Theory.

2. According to the Routine Activity Theory, the condition for crime is the presence of a suitable target(s) and the absence of a guardian(s). It is important to note that something or the other will always be present to motivate potential offenders to commit crime. So, there will always be motivated offenders. If motivated offenders are present, so suitable targets will be present in the society on the other side for crime to take place. So, suitable targets cannot be left unguarded which will increase the probability of crime, considering the target is in an isolated position. Even a weak guardian is sometimes equivalent to no guardian or protector. So, I think, presence of guardian(s), more specifically, more capable guardian(s) plays the greatest role at reducing

8 0
3 years ago
God bless everyone have a good day!
torisob [31]

Answer:

You too!

Explanation:

Im working on my schoolwork right now and it makes me happy to help other people

6 0
3 years ago
What made the creation of the Constitution a radical document?
yanalaym [24]

Answer:

Most of the structure of the organization was a combination of Greek and Roman influences, most of the Bill of Rights taken from the common law of England / Magna Carta, but the truly unique thing was that it did not allow religious trials to hold office, and prevent religious establishment.

Significantly, this did not apply to the provinces at first, only to the provincial government. Many provinces immediately declared their official state religion. This went under the inclusion doctrine found in amendment 14.

Hope it helps!

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The fact that the Supreme Court has jurisdiction in a case is no guarantee the justices will hear it.
saul85 [17]
First, the case must be appealled to even make it to the SCOTUS. However, probably the most important condition is that a given case must pose a question about the constitution.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are at least four laws or regulations professionals in this pathway must abide by or follow?
    9·1 answer
  • Which is the most important speech given at the national convention?​
    5·1 answer
  • What does the term juvenile waiver refer to?
    7·2 answers
  • What is the difference between probation supervision and intensive probation supervision
    14·1 answer
  • Which phrase best completes the diagram ( brown v. Board of education) ( Hernandez v. Texas) HELP
    13·1 answer
  • Identify a road safety regulation for a passenger in a car and why that measure is
    7·1 answer
  • Define the term gender imbalance and state two negative effects that this may have in the workplace?
    11·1 answer
  • In lucy v. zehmer, the two parties were drinking in a bar when lucy offered to buy zehmer's farm.
    13·1 answer
  • Who owns the alcoholic beverages of a private club?
    12·1 answer
  • pls help Who was prosecuting Ernesto Miranda? (Hint: what government entity is bringing the case against the defendant?)
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!