1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
soldier1979 [14.2K]
3 years ago
6

Suppose an industry has 100 firms, each with a supply curve P = 50 + 10Q . Furthermore, suppose the market demand curve is given

by P = 200 - 0.9Q . a. What is the industry supply curve? b. What is the equilibrium price and quantity for this market? c. How many units of output will be produced by a firm operating in this market with a marginal cost function, MC = 130Q
Business
1 answer:
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: See explanation

Explanation:

The industry supply curve will be the supply curve given multiplied by the total number of firms. This will be:

P = 50 + 0.1Q

Check: since Q = 100

P = 50 + 10/100Q

P = 50 + 0.1Q

To get the Equilibrium price and quantity, we've to equate the market demand curve and supply. This will be:

Market demand = P = 200 - 0.9Q

Market Supply = P = 50 + 0.1Q

Therefore,

200 - 0.9Q = 50 + 0.1Q

200 - 50 = 0.1Q + 0.9Q

150 = Q

Equilibrium quantity = 150 units

Since P = 50 + 0.1Q

P = 50 + 0.1(150)

P = 50 + 15

P = 65

Equilibrium price is 65.

The units of output that will be produced by a firm operating in this market with a marginal cost function, MC = 130Q will be 2.

You might be interested in
What the Business ethics<br> About USA
AlexFokin [52]

Answer:

General professional conduct, social values, anti-discrimination, fair labor standards, financial responsibility and honest marketing.

6 0
2 years ago
Nationally what two factors caused the bubble in the real estate market
ehidna [41]
Low interest rates and loose credit standards

8 0
4 years ago
A monopolist finds that a person’s demand for its product depends on the person’s age. The inverse demand function of someone of
KiRa [710]

Explanation:

A manufacturer of computer memory chips produces chips in lots of 1000. If nothing has gone wrong in the manufacturing process, at most 7 chips each lot would be defective, but if something does go wrong, there could be far more defective chips. If something goes wrong with a given lot, they discard the entire lot. It would be prohibitively expensive to test every chip in every lot, so they want to make the decision of whether or not to discard a given lot on the basis of the number of defective chips in a simple random sample. They decide they can afford to test 100 chips from each lot. You are hired as their statistician.

There is a tradeoff between the cost of eroneously discarding a good lot, and the cost of warranty claims if a bad lot is sold. The next few problems refer to this scenario.

Problem 8. (Continues previous problem.) A type I error occurs if (Q12)

Problem 9. (Continues previous problem.) A type II error occurs if (Q13)

Problem 10. (Continues previous problem.) Under the null hypothesis, the number of defective chips in a simple random sample of size 100 has a (Q14) distribution, with parameters (Q15)

Problem 11. (Continues previous problem.) To have a chance of at most 2% of discarding a lot given that the lot is good, the test should reject if the number of defectives in the sample of size 100 is greater than or equal to (Q16)

Problem 12. (Continues previous problem.) In that case, the chance of rejecting the lot if it really has 50 defective chips is (Q17)

Problem 13. (Continues previous problem.) In the long run, the fraction of lots with 7 defectives that will get discarded erroneously by this test is (Q18)

Problem 14. (Continues previous problem.) The smallest number of defectives in the lot for which this test has at least a 98% chance of correctly detecting that the lot was bad is (Q19)

(Continues previous problem.) Suppose that whether or not a lot is good is random, that the long-run fraction of lots that are good is 95%, and that whether each lot is good is independent of whether any other lot or lots are good. Assume that the sample drawn from a lot is independent of whether the lot is good or bad. To simplify the problem even more, assume that good lots contain exactly 7 defective chips, and that bad lots contain exactly 50 defective chips.

Problem 15. (Continues previous problem.) The number of lots the manufacturer has to produce to get one good lot that is not rejected by the test has a (Q20) distribution, with parameters (Q21)

Problem 16. (Continues previous problem.) The expected number of lots the manufacturer must make to get one good lot that is not rejected by the test is (Q22)

Problem 17. (Continues previous problem.) With this test and this mix of good and bad lots, among the lots that pass the test, the long-run fraction of lots that are actually bad is (Q23)

7 0
3 years ago
The environmental protection agency of a county would like to preserve a piece of land as a wilderness area. The current owner h
charle [14.2K]

Answer: The answer is given below

Explanation:

Here , we are going to apply the present value of annuty formula.

a. Social Opportunity cost = $1.1 Million

The Yearly cash flows = $110,000

Time (n) = 20 years

The Discount rate (R) = 4%

Net benefits= Present value of cash inflows - the intial socail opportnity cost

Net benefits= Yearly cash flow × (1 - 1/(1+R)^n) / R - 1100000

Net benefits = 110000 × (1 - 1/1.04^20)/0.04 - (1100000)

= $394936

b. We will use the formula for present value of an annuity with the growth rate in benefits as 2 percent.

Firstly, dg= (0.04 - 0.02)/ (1+0.02)

= 0.01961

PV(benefits) = [($110,000)÷ (1+0.02)][1-(1+dg)-20]/dg]

= $1,770,045

NPV = $1,770,045 - $1,100,000= $670,045

7 0
3 years ago
Johnson Company uses the allowance method to account for uncollectible accounts receivable. Bad debt expense is established as a
MArishka [77]

Answer:

1. The Bad debt expense for 2013 is $67,500

2. The amount of accounts receivable written off during 2013 is $69,500

3. If the company uses the direct write-off method, the bad debt expense for 2013 would be $69,500

Explanation:

1.  In order toCalculate the bad debt expense for 2013 we would have to make the following calculation:

Bad debt expense=1.5% of Net Credit Sales

=1.5%×$4,500,000

=$67,500

The Bad debt expense for 2013 is $67,500

2. In order to Determine the amount of accounts receivable written off during 2013 we would have to make the following calculation:

amount of accounts receivable written off=$42,000+$67,500-$40,000

amount of accounts receivable written off=$69,500

The amount of accounts receivable written off during 2013 is $69,500

3. Using direct write off method, the bad debt expense is recognized only when the actual bad debt is incurred. The actual bad expense would be the amount of accounts receivable written off during the year. Accounts receivable written off during the year would be same in both the methods.

Thus, the bad debt expense for the year 2013 would be $69,500.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Walter Utilities is a dividend-paying company and is expected to pay an annual dividend of $0.65 at the end of the year. Its div
    15·1 answer
  • Hudek Inc., a manufacturing Corporation, has provided the following data for the month of July. The balance in the Work in Proce
    9·1 answer
  • Which choice gives a reason that property rights must be protected in a market economy?
    5·2 answers
  • Children with visual impairments tend to be more______ in social environments
    12·1 answer
  • A corporation was incorporated on January 1, Year 6, with $500,000 from the issuance of stock and borrowed funds of $75,000. Dur
    12·1 answer
  • If Jane attends graduate school, it will take her two years, during which time she will earn no income. She will pay a total of
    7·1 answer
  • The following information describes a​ company's usage of direct labor in a recent​ period: Actual direct labor hours used 40 co
    10·1 answer
  • Allure Company manufactures and distributes two products, M and XY. Overhead costs are currently allocated using the number of u
    8·1 answer
  • What is implication for the Government in the tax policy ?
    12·2 answers
  • Nick has a job. The first place he should look for health care coverage is because the costs will probably be the for the genero
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!