Answer:
The correct answer is d) neither the long-run Phillips curve nor the Classical dichotomy.
Explanation:
The answer that best suits the situation described is the Phillips curve in the short term but not in the long term.
The Phillips curve starts from the principle that the amount of money circulating (commonly called "money supply") has real effects on the economy in the short term. In this way, an increase in the money supply would have a beneficial effect on aggregate demand, as citizens will spend more when their nominal wages are increased (known as “monetary illusion”) and a more favorable framework for investment and investment will be created. that the prospects of rising prices will improve the expectations of corporate profits. The improvement in aggregate demand would result in greater economic growth, and this in turn in the creation of new jobs. This is how an inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment is established, expressed graphically by a downward curve.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Free slack can be described as the total amount of time a project can be delayed without affecting the project's completion time . Tom and the contractor share a slack time of 10 days
Total slack measures the total amount of time a project can be delayed before the project's completion.
Functional slack measures the amount of time that each activity in a project can be delayed without affecting the project's completion time.
Answer:
D1 = $3.50
D2 = $3.50
D3 = $3.50
Ke = 10% = 0.1
Po = <u>D1</u> + <u>D2</u> + <u>D3
</u>
(1+ke) (1+ke)2 (1+ke)3
Po = <u>$3.50</u> + <u>$3.50</u> + <u>$3.50
</u>
(1+0.1) (1+0.1)2 (1+0.1)3
Po = $3.18 + $2.89 + $2.63
Po = $8.70
None of the above
Explanation:
In this scenario, we need to discount the dividend in each year by the required at rate of return of 10%. The aggregate of the price obtained as a result of discounting in year 1 to year 3 gives the current market price.
Answer:
It will Decreases U.S. real GDP and on the other way round it will increases the well-being of a typical working person in the U.S.
Explanation:
The impact of the decline in working hours is that it will Decreases U.S. real GDP and on the other way round it will definitely lead to increase in the well-being of a typical working person in the U.S. because of the decline in the U.S work week which was formally 60 hours in the 1980 but now 40 hours today because a typical working person will have more time for him/her and the stress involved in working for 60 hours per week will reduce when compared with working for 40 hours per week because a typical working person in the U.S will preferred to work for 40 hours per week than 60hours per week for the betterment of their well being.
