1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zubka84 [21]
3 years ago
5

Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeelp

History
1 answer:
Elza [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: 30

Explanation:

I would say 30 because if you add the two numbers then round it get you 30! (Sorry if this made no sense)

You might be interested in
What was the purpose of the declaratory act
Nikitich [7]
To appease colonists by repealing the Stamp Act, save face and end the boycotts on trade.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the framers of the constitution seek to resolve the problem with the articles of confederation?
Flauer [41]

The Confederation Congress was the legislative branch of government established by the Articles of Confederation.Articles of Confederation, a compact among the thirteen original states,

6 0
3 years ago
The Radical Republicans’ goals included all of the following except:
miv72 [106K]

The Radical Republicans were a faction of American politicians within the Republican Party of the United States from around 1854 (before the American Civil War) until the end of Reconstruction in 1877. They called themselves "Radicals", with a goal of immediate, complete, permanent eradication of slavery, without compromise. They were opposed during the War by the moderate Republicans (led by U.S. President Abraham Lincoln), and by the pro-slavery and anti-Reconstruction Democratic Party as well as liberals in the Northern United States during Reconstruction. Radicals led efforts after the war to establish civil rights for former slaves and fully implement emancipation. After weaker measures in 1866 resulted in violence against former slaves in the rebel states, Radicals pushed the Fourteenth Amendment and statutory protections through Congress. They disfavored allowing ex-Confederate officers to retake political power in the Southern United States, and emphasized equality, civil rights and voting rights for the "freedmen", i.e. people who had been enslaved by state slavery laws within the United States.[1]

During the war, Radical Republicans opposed Lincoln's initial selection of General George B. McClellan for top command of the major eastern Army of the Potomac and Lincoln's efforts in 1864 to bring seceded Southern states back into the Union as quickly and easily as possible. Lincoln later recognized McClellan's weakness and relieved him of command. The Radicals passed their own Reconstruction plan through Congress in 1864, but Lincoln vetoed it and was putting his own policies in effect as military commander-in-chief when he was assassinated in April 1865.[2] Radicals pushed for the uncompensated abolition of slavery, while Lincoln wanted to pay slave owners who were loyal to the Union. After the war, the Radicals demanded civil rights for freed slaves, including measures ensuring suffrage. They initiated the various Reconstruction Acts as well as the Fourteenth Amendment and limited political and voting rights for ex-Confederate civil officials and military officers. They keenly fought Lincoln's successor, Andrew Johnson, a former slave owner from Tennessee who favored allowing Southern states to decide the rights and status of former slaves. After Johnson vetoed various congressional acts favoring civil rights for former slaves, they attempted to remove him from office through impeachment, which failed by one vote in 1868.

4 0
3 years ago
30 POINTS Which of the following correctly describes the Anti-Federalist position on including the Bill of Rights?
PSYCHO15rus [73]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

They were anti expanding the government they didn’t want laws adding to its power.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does the sedition act of 1918 impact the war effort? explain.
tekilochka [14]

Answer:

The Sedition Act of 1918 curtailed the free speech rights of U.S. citizens during times of war.

Passed on May 16, 1918, as an amendment to Title I of the Espionage Act of 1917, the act provided for further and expanded limitations on speech. Ultimately, its passage came to be viewed as an instance of government overstepping the bounds of First Amendment freedoms.

President Woodrow Wilson, in conjunction with congressional leaders and the influential newspapers of the era, urged passage of the Sedition Act in the midst of U.S. involvement in World War I. Wilson was concerned about the country’s diminishing morale and looking for a way to clamp down on growing and widespread disapproval of the war and the military draft that had been instituted to fight it.

The provisions of the act prohibited certain types of speech as it related to the war or the military. Under the act, it was illegal to incite disloyalty within the military; use in speech or written form any language that was disloyal to the government, the Constitution, the military, or the flag; advocate strikes on labor production; promote principles that were in violation of the act or support countries at war with the United States.

The targets of prosecution under the Sedition Act were typically individuals who opposed the war effort, including pacifists, anarchists, and socialists. Violations of the Sedition Act could lead to as much as twenty years in prison and a fine of $10,000. More than two thousand cases were filed by the government under the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918, and of these more than one thousand ended in convictions.

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions of many of the individuals prosecuted. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. established the “clear and present danger” test in Schenck v. United States (1919). In upholding Socialist Charles Schenck’s conviction, Justice Holmes wrote that “the most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic.” The Court also unanimously upheld convictions in Debs v. United States (1919) and Frohwerk v. United States (1919).

In Abrams v. United States (1919), the Court reviewed the conviction under the act of Jacob Abrams, who, along with four other Russian defendants, was prosecuted for printing and distributing leaflets calling for workers to strike in an effort to end military involvement in the Soviet Union. The Court in late 1919 upheld the conviction.

However, in this instance Holmes, along with Justice Louis D. Brandeis, dissented from the majority, arguing that the “clear and present danger” test was not met under the circumstances arising in the case. Specifically, Holmes felt that Abrams had not possessed the necessary intent to harm the U.S. war effort. In contrast to his majority opinion in Schenck, Holmes’s dissenting opinion in Abrams urged that political speech be protected under the First Amendment.

The Sedition Act of 1918 was repealed in 1920, although many parts of the original Espionage Act remained in force.

Hope this helps, have a nice day/night! :D

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the bargain anger Jackson supporters
    7·2 answers
  • The _______ provided settlers 160 acres of land if they agreed to move west to live and farm on the land for 5 years.
    8·2 answers
  • All of thes are found in a commond economy except
    11·1 answer
  • Which selection below reflects how the majority of Americans receive their citizenship to the United States?
    5·2 answers
  • Are black people embarrassed to eat watermelons
    12·2 answers
  • Why did the Aztecs build a city on an island in Lake Texcoco?
    11·1 answer
  • HELP ME PLEASE WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST 5 WHOLE POINTS IM BEGGING YALL PLEASE HELP ME I NEED THIS ASAP PLEASE BE CONCIDERATE WITH ME
    11·1 answer
  • Who invaded from Holland in 1588?
    13·1 answer
  • 7<br> O B) water,Air<br> 10) The caste system is a form of.<br> A) quality<br> B)inequality
    8·1 answer
  • ⚠️FAST PLEASE IM TIMED⚠️
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!