Victor probably suffers from Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
This disease has an unknown cause. However, the generating factors are usually genetic and environmental.
The person needs to be the center of attention, there for need to show that everything he has is better. Requires constant compliments. May manifest with the behaviors that show others that one is superior, such as expensive material possessions, or an obsession with vanity and appearances.
The NPD causes problems in many areas of life, such as relationships, work, school or financial affairs
The manifestation of the disease can be characterized in two types <u>the oblivious narcissist</u> and <u>the hypervigilant narcissist.
</u>
The first one is unaware of his condition, does not understand people's reaction.
The second is fully aware of his attitudes, but cannot control it.
Answer:
<em>Discrimination</em>
Explanation:
Discrimination is the ability to distinguish between similar stimuli. In this problem, Calista reacts negatively to a typical doctor's office but does not have the same reaction in a dentist's office. This shows she only responds to certain stimuli and does not respond to those that are similar.
Answer:
l am like cool but my parents are so negative impact so it is worng
Authenticating or Identifying Evidence, Rule 901 (a) ALL IN ALL. The proponent must provide evidence adequate to sustain a finding that the item is what the proponent asserts it is in order to satisfy the requirement of authenticating or identifying an item of evidence.
<h3>What is Rule 901. Authenticating or Identifying Evidence?</h3>
Authenticating or Identifying Evidence, Rule 901 (a) ALL IN ALL. The proponent must provide evidence adequate to sustain a finding that the item is what the proponent asserts it is in order to satisfy the requirement of authenticating or identifying an item of evidence. The authenticity of the evidence is one need that must be met for it to be considered admissible by the court. A rule of evidence known as "authentication" stipulates that there must be adequate evidence to support a determination that the thing in question is what its proponent says.
The first step in authenticating a piece of evidence is to call a witness who can attest from personal experience that it is what the claimant says it is. As an illustration, in United States v. Evidence must be sufficiently demonstrated to establish its authenticity in order for it to be admitted into court. Only a prima facie showing is necessary, hence the burden of proof for authentication is relatively low.
To learn more about Rule 901 refer to:
brainly.com/question/24261690
#SPJ4
Answer: C.
Its not a cluster, peer review, or a draft. Therefore: a mindmap.
