Answer:
A. 10
B. 300
C. -3
D. -3,567
Step-by-step explanation:
im pretty sure this is coreect i apologize if not
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Instead, since the divisor is in the form of
, use what is called Synthetic Division. Remember, in this formula,
gives you the OPPOSITE terms of what they really are, so do not forget it. Anyway, here is how it is done:
4| 1 −5 7 −12
↓ 4 −4 12
_______________
1 −1 3 0 → 
You start by placing the
in the top left corner, then list all the coefficients of your dividend [x³ - 5x² + 7x - 12]. You bring down the original term closest to
then begin your multiplication. Now depending on what symbol your result is tells you whether the next step is to subtract or add, then you continue this process starting with multiplication all the way up until you reach the end. Now, when the last term is 0, that means you have no remainder. Finally, your quotient is one degree less than your dividend, so that 1 in your quotient can be an
, the −1 [
] follows right behind it, and bringing up the rear, comes the 3, giving you the quotient of
.
I am joyous to assist you anytime.
Answer:
The data are at the
<u>Nominal</u> level of measurement.
The given calculation is wrong because average (mean) cannot be calculated for nominal level of measurement.
Step-by-step explanation:
The objective here is to Identify the level of measurement of the data, and explain what is wrong with the given calculation.
a)
The data are at the <u> Nominal </u> level of measurement due to the fact that it portrays the qualitative levels of naming and representing different hierarchies from 100 basketball, 200 basketball, 300 football, 400 anything else
b) We are being informed that, the average (mean) is calculated for 597 respondents and the result is 256.1.
The given calculation is wrong because average (mean) cannot be calculated for nominal level of measurement. At nominal level this type of data set do not measure at all , it is not significant to compute their average (mean).
Answer:
i do not know
Step-by-step explanation: