Answer:
The exact definition for chain of command when it comes to evidence is the witnessed and written record of everyone who came in contact with the evidence and had unbroken control of it. Following the chain of command ensures that the evidence collected at the scene is the same evidence that is entered in the courtroom.
Does this help?
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Since the woman didn't mean to, the best explanation would be an accident. Hope i helped and have a wonderful day! :)))
Answer:
No because it violated the Commerce Clause.
Explanation:
As you may already know, the states that make up the US have the autonomy to formulate their own legislation that must be obeyed within state boundaries. However, even with its own legislation, each state is subject to federal laws, which must be obeyed by all. There is a federal law that prohibits states from violating trade clauses, so state laws should be made so as not to violate that federal law, for example.
There was no federal law dealing with truck mud flaps, so the state of Illinois decided to create its own legislation that required trucks to move around the state to use curved mud flaps because it guaranteed road safety. Although the state of Illinois intended to be good and there was no federal law barring that law, the state of Illinois violated a trade clause by preventing trucks from other states from unloading goods to local trade. For this reason, we can say that the statute formulated by the state of Illinois was not constitutional because it violated a federal clause.
Answer D, due to the fact that driving through a pool of water at very high speeds can increase the chances of a fatal accident.
Answer:
3 times
Explanation:
"False Claims Act [31 U.S.C.
It is illegal to submit claims for payment to Medicare or Medicaid that you know or should know are false or fraudulent. Filing false claims may result in <u>fines of up to three times</u> the programs' loss plus $11,000 per claim filed."
