Answer:
Generally speaking, yes, grassroots organizations such as the Sierra Club represent political party's interests at the local level, since the Sierra Club has "local chapters" all over the nation.
Explanation:
Answer: Time in prison.
Employment is lost.
Children's custody is taken away from them.
Treatment for alcoholism that has been ordered by the court.
If you are convicted of manslaughter as a result of a DUI, you may lose your right to:
College financial aid
The right to vote.
Housing assistances provided by the government.
The right to keep and bear arms.
employment in certain fields of study.
Professional Licensing
Parental authority.
Passports.
Explanation: Adding as answer :)
Answer:
federal judges and justices
Answer:
Yes it is lawful.
Explanation:
A sentence of probation is actually an alternative of a jail sentence. The Courts have found that probationers have reduced expectations of privacy so they don't have the same Fourth Amendment rights as others. Courts can require probationers to submit to warrantless searches not supported by probable cause. The goal is only to help rehabilitate the probationer, protect society, or both.
Although officers usually need warrants or probable cause before they can search a person or home, a search condition eliminates this requirement. In some states, an officer must have reasonable suspicion before conducting a probation search, but in others, an officer can conduct searches at any time, even without reason to believe that the probationer committed a crime. Some of these search conditions allow only probation officers to search, while others authorize both probation and police officers to do the same
The Fourth Amendment typically prevents police from searching someone’s body, belongings, or home without a warrant or probable cause. But judges gives a condition of sentencing someone to probation, that the probationer agree to warrantless searches. Since this condition does not entitled the probationer’s normal Fourth Amendment rights, it’s sometimes called a “Fourth waiver.”
Answer: b. police officers were often used as a source of political patronage and corruption
Explanation:
In the 18th and 19th centuries, and following the decentralisation of police to city level, police had greater discretion in dealing with issues in their jurisdiction. This was meant to make crime easier to manage but instead it led to corruption.
Police became guilty of being used as a source of political patronage as well as being corrupt. As a reward for engaging in electoral fraud, the police were rewarded by the politicians they put in power by bribes and more powers at their discretion which allowed them to use force on the populace.
As a result the police were ineffective and resented by the public.