1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
irina1246 [14]
3 years ago
15

On January 1, 2009, a comedian from State A filed a diversity action in State A federal court against an actor from State B. The

lawsuit was brought based on alleged wrongful business torts that occurred on January 15, 2004. The comedian seeks $80,000 in compensatory damages. State A has a five-year statute of limitations for tort claims. On January 25, 2009, the actor, upset about the lawsuit, deliberately drove his car into the comedian's car. A week later, the comedian brought an intentional tort claim against the actor in her already filed lawsuit.
Required:
May the comedian add this additional intentional tort claim in a supplemental pleading to her already existing lawsuit against the actor?
Law
1 answer:
VMariaS [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Yes.

Under Civil and Pretrial Procedures, the comedian may add the additional intentional tort claim as a supplemental pleading to her already existing lawsuit against the actor.  Moreover, the supplemental pleading is very timely.

Explanation:

When the comedian sues the actor for an intentional tort,  she needs to show that the actor, who caused the harm to the car, acted willfully and knowingly.  That means the actor deliberately caused the damage to the car in an act of recklessness.   Since the supplemental pleading for intentional tort is timely, the comedian simply needs to demonstrate that the actor caused the damage to the car on purpose, knowing fully well that his act would damage the car or cause some harm.

You might be interested in
The "iron law of oligarchy" is a principle
dalvyx [7]

Answer:

B. Of organizational life according to which even democratic organizations will become bureaucracies ruled by a few individuals.

Explanation:

The "iron law of oligarchy" notes that all types of organization must gradually and inevitably develop oligarchic tendencies, regardless of how democratic they may be at the outset, rendering true democracy actually and theoretically impossible, particularly in large groups and complex organisations, it is an Organizational theory in which even a democratic entity inevitably evolves into a bureaucracy dominated by a few individuals.

The "iron law of oligarchy " reflects that if a democratic organisation, then a non-democratic organisation, will never be fully democratic.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The number of representatives a state gets depends on
Sladkaya [172]
I believe it's population
4 0
2 years ago
18. "Jurisdiction" means what? *
Dovator [93]
The courts legal ability to hear a case
4 0
2 years ago
Michael, a 25-year-old man, has committed serious felonies such as arson, assault, and battery. An analysis of his personality s
Andreyy89

Answer:

Although Michael broke the law from Negative Traits, Micheal is still responsible for his actions, he knows from right from wrong. Therfore charges should stand.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Why did the chicken cross the road?? ;)
Afina-wow [57]

Answer:

to get to the other side!!!

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why do YOU think the press should be regulated?
    12·1 answer
  • An investigator takes a photograph that includes a dollar bill as a size reference. This is most likely what type of photograph?
    5·1 answer
  • (BRAINLIEST PLS HELP ME )
    9·1 answer
  • What market forces influence wages?
    15·1 answer
  • Find the solution to the system of equations
    9·1 answer
  • What are some factors officers need to consider to justify use of force?
    8·1 answer
  • according to the text, what percent of respondents admitted to actually committing an unethical or illegal act in the past year?
    8·1 answer
  • What political party or interest group do you think will best help you achieve your goal? Explain why you chose this group and w
    7·1 answer
  • If a I ordered someone to buy for me a sock absorber for of road driving and bought the one that get spoiled after the first roa
    9·1 answer
  • However, a few Article 2 provisions (e.g., the implied warranty of merchantability) are narrower and require a person to be a me
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!