Thet contradict each other, that's why both of them are incorrect.
<span>Suppose that a polynomial has four roots: s, t, u, and v. If the polynomial were evaluated at any of these values, it would have to be zero. Therefore, the polynomial can be written in this form.
p(x)(x - s)(x - t)(x - u)(x - v), where p(x) is some non-zero polynomial
This polynomial has a degree of at least 4. It therefore cannot be cubic.
Now prove Kelsey correct. We have already proved that there can be no more than three roots. To prove that a cubic polynomial with three roots is possible, all we have to do is offer a single example of that. This one will do.
(x - 1)(x - 2)(x - 3)
This is a cubic polynomial with three roots, and four or more roots are not possible for a cubic polynomial. Kelsey is correct.
Incidentally, if this is a roller coaster we are discussing, then a cubic polynomial is not such a good idea, either for a vertical curve or a horizontal curve. I hope this helps</span><span>
</span>
X + x - 1 + 43 = 180. Solve for x. 2x +42 = 180 and 2x = 138. Therefore, x = 69. If x = 69, then angle H is 68 and angle G is 69. 68 + 69 + 43 = 180.
C = total cents
C = 30 + n
I think that's it. Hope it helps you.
Answer:
1. $109.20 2. $46.80
Step-by-step explanation:
Doing the math, we find that 30% of 156 (138+18) is 46.80, which answers the second part of this problem. Plugging this value into the first part of the equation gives us what Stefan originally paid.
Good luck! Hope this helps!
