Answer:
I think Spain best illustrates the statement "contact with Europeans dramatically alters American Indian societies, both culturally and economically."
Explanation:
Plains Native Americans(American Indians) lived in a variety of sedentary and nomadic communities before the invasion of Spanish colonizers.
They farmed corn, hunted, and
often gathered, establishing different lifestyles and eating healthy diets but with the arrival of horses on the Plains along with the Spanish colonizers, they disrupted their agricultural norms and intensified hunting competition between American Indian groups.
The Spanish altered American Indian lives in many ways. Their intrusion resulted in changing the tribal customs and religious traditions of the American Indian community. Tribal alliances changed positions and new rivalries were developed. American Indians lost their land, their families, and their way of life.
The Indians were then compelled to feed the invaders with food initially used to feed themselves. This furthers proved to be a burden during the dry growing seasons. Implementing the encomienda and repartimiento systems which forced Indians to pay taxes with their food, blankets, and their labor. Repartimiento was a disadvantage to the Indians because it took from them their own fields to plant and harvest instead forced them to plant and harvest on the Spanish fields thereby altering their economy as a people
Answer:
Techological improvements allowed for mass printing of newspapers and books in the 19th and 20th centuries. This has had an economic, commercial and social impact. It was possible to reach thousands or even millions of people with a single edition; it was possible now to reach a massive audience who did not have higher education, but wanted to read news and have some form of entertainment. People have always wanted to know about shocking events, disasters, tragedies, violent crimes and the juicy details of the romantic life of those famous and powerful. There is an old phrase of American journalism: "Dog bites man, that´s not news. Man bites dog, that´s news." So , newspapers for a massive audience were set up and exploited stories about violence, crime and sex. That´s the advent of "yellow journalism" in the modern world. Besides, having a high number of readers or subscribers assured profits for newspaper owners, because the larger the audience, the larger the advertising revenues. This logic continues to be true today.
Explanation:
Nhajahsjshsjjshshabaguahagsvsbsbsjsjshdh
Not sure but hope what I know help a little...Slavery was “an unqualified evil to the negro, the white man, and the State,” said Abraham Lincoln in the 1850s. Yet in his first inaugural address, Lincoln declared that he had “no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with slavery in the States where it exists.” He reiterated this pledge in his first message to Congress on July 4, 1861, when the Civil War was three months old.<span>Did You Know?When it took effect in January 1863, the Emancipation Proclamation freed 3.1 million of the nation's 4 million slaves.</span>
What explains this apparent inconsistency in Lincoln’s statements? And how did he get from his pledge not to interfere with slavery to a decision a year later to issue an emancipation proclamation? The answers lie in the Constitution and in the course of the Civil War. As an individual, Lincoln hated slavery. As a Republican, he wished to exclude it from the territories as the first step to putting the institution “in the course of ultimate extinction.”
