Answer:
100 pascals would be your answer
have a great day ! ⭐️
Answer:
<u>The balance in the account after 10 years is US$ 2,442.81</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Let's review the data given to us for answering the question:
Investment amount = US$ 2,000
Duration of the investment = 10 years
Annual interest rate = 2% compounded continuously
2. Let's find the future value of this investment after 10 years, using the following formula:
FV = PV * eˣ ⁿ
PV = Investment = US$ 2,000
number of periods (n) = 10 (10 years compounded continuously)
rate (x) = 2% = 0.02
e = 2.71828 (Euler's number)
Replacing with the real values, we have:
FV = 2,000 * (2.71828)^0.02*10
FV = 2,000 * 2.71828^0.2
FV = 2,000 * 1.2214027
<u>FV = US$ 2,442.81</u>
Answer:
c)The proof writer mentally assumed the conclusion. He wrote "suppose n is an arbitrary integer", but was really thinking "suppose n is an arbitrary integer, and suppose that for this n, there exists an integer k that satisfies n < k < n+2." Under those assumptions, it follows indeed that k must be n + 1, which justifies the word "therefore": but of course assuming the conclusion destroyed the validity of the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
when we claim something as a hypothesis we can only conclude with therefore at the end of the proof. so assuming the conclusion nulify the proof from the beginning
Answer: The first option (A)
Step-by-step explanation:
The graph is misleading because it appears to be showing a huge increase, however, it is showing this increase over a huge time span of 13 years, which is actually quite a small amount for only a few hundred customer increase.
