1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VLD [36.1K]
3 years ago
12

PLEASE ANSWER ASAP!! In your opinion was this expansion by the United States morally right or wrong? Give me three reasons to su

pport your answer.
History
1 answer:
Gala2k [10]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Morally Right

Explanation:

1. We bought and/or won the lands

2. The U.S. is the greatest country in the world and has spread it's ideas and democracy across not only North America but the world.

3. The population today in areas where we won and/or bought are safer under U.S. rule than the alternative (Mexico).

You might be interested in
Which of the following principles is shared between the English Bill of Rights and the U.S. Bill of Rights? A. right to bear arm
Bezzdna [24]

Answer:

freedom of speech

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
After the 1500s, what was a main difference between France and England?
Serga [27]

I just took this test ! The answer is C

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Following the end of the World War II, the Allied forces (dominated by the U.S.) occupied Japan from 1945 to 1952. As we learned
babymother [125]
No te entiendo wey...!!!
6 0
2 years ago
Which of the following statements is true regarding the Soviet Union under Lenin? . . I have narrowed it down to:. 1. The govern
bearhunter [10]

The statement that is true regarding the Soviet Union under Lenin is “The Communist party held absolute control over the government.” The correct answer between all the choices given is the second choice or number 2. I am hoping that this answer has satisfied your query and it will be able to help you, and if you would like, feel free to ask another question.

8 0
2 years ago
How was the portuguese colonial in africa in the 1520s different from that of the dutch in the 1650s
ladessa [460]

Answer:

How was the Portuguese colonial experience in Africa in the 1520s different from that of the Dutch in the 1650s? A. The Portuguese were met with legal action, while the Dutch were treated as honored guests. ... The Portuguese were met with cooperation, while the Dutch were met with threats of banishment.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How was Italy organized politically before and during the renaissance
    9·1 answer
  • If a bond sells for face value, it is selling at a discount.
    14·1 answer
  • Which was the Catholic Church’s most powerful tool in maintaining its authority in medieval Europe
    5·1 answer
  • What are two categories of nonviolent protest used in the African American Civil Rights Movement?
    5·1 answer
  • What effect did Blackwell’s life and career have on other women
    13·1 answer
  • What revolution would you say is taking place today? Why?​
    8·2 answers
  • What was the Triple Alliance?<br> What was the Triple Entente?
    12·1 answer
  • How did General Scott's Union blockade plan affect Georgia during the Civil War?
    15·1 answer
  • Which element of modern democracy is most related to Greco Roman principles
    13·1 answer
  • What happened in the pig war? please explain in three sentences!
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!