When an adolescent's newly sophisticated metacognitive capability causes him or her to become self-absorbed and believe that the world is focused on only him or her, this is called <u>b) adolescent egocentrism</u>.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Adolescent egocentrism is the term used by psychologist to describe the incapability of young people to differentiate between their perception of what people think about them and what others actually think in reality.
The adolescent egocentrism concept was expressed by the psychologist David Elkind. Adolescent egocentrism is found in children of age 10-14 years. They always think about what others will think about them. The young people consider themselves as center of attention and never focus on others views.
Answer:
Sociology, anthropology, philosophy, history of religion and psychology, is the right answers.
Explanation:
The educational field dedicated to research into theological ideas, practices, and systems, is known as the study of religion or Religious studies. It explains, correlates, paraphrases, and interprets religion, maintaining orderly, historically based, and cross-cultural viewpoints.
While theology strives to recognize the nature of surpassing or divine powers, religious studies attempt to study moral behavior and knowledge from outside any remarkable religious perspective. There are many disciplines and methodology through which the religious studies are drawn, for instance, sociology, anthropology, philosophy, history of religion and psychology.
Answer:
its A I did the test last month
Answer:
This passage is true, and reflected the dominant mood of the creole elites during the period.
Explanation:
In Latin America, elites were more identified with the metropoli, as they justified their economic dominion over the popular classes with the authority of it (the status quo). For that, it was a more conservative class, and it was not until it seemed that the European monarchy turned to a more liberal standing (which was what happened in Spain in 1820) or the fact that the weakened metropoli could not guarantee it's interests (the case of Brazil and Portugal) that these elites decided to side with the independence movements, but always maintaining the conservative, rigid and stratified status quo, not a liberal and democratic revolution.
