1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
motikmotik
3 years ago
9

Compare 8 ⋅ 107 to 2 ⋅ 104. Plz Answer 25 Points!!!

Mathematics
2 answers:
Ivahew [28]3 years ago
5 0
8*107 > 2*104  IT'S KINDA LOGIC HERE 8 = 2^3
so 2^3 * 107 > 2*104

for the rest we can divide the two
<u>8*10^7</u>     =    <u> 2^3*10^7</u>     
2*10^4               2*10^4

after simplification we will have  2^2 * 10^3 = 4*1000 = 4000 true
so 8*10^8 is 4 000 times larger than 2*10^4

Shalnov [3]3 years ago
3 0
The answer is the first row.

Explanation:

8 * 10^7 = 80,000,000 -- 2 * 10^4 = 20,000

80,000,000 divided by 20,000 = 4,000, so it is 4,000 times larger

Therefore, the first answer is correct.

Hope I helped and good luck!
You might be interested in
Can you help me please ​
Olin [163]

Answer:

(2,1)

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Common factor of 10 and5
emmasim [6.3K]
Common factors include: 5 and 1
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pretest: Unit 1
Alex_Xolod [135]

A vertical line that the graph of a function approaches but never intersects. The correct option is B.

<h3>When do we get vertical asymptote for a function?</h3>

Suppose that we have the function f(x) such that it is continuous for all input values < a or > a and have got the values of f(x) going  to infinity or -ve infinity (from either side of   x = a) as x goes near a, and is not defined at   x = a, then at that point, there can be constructed a vertical line  x = a and it will be called as vertical asymptote for f(x) at   x = a

A vertical asymptote can be described as a vertical line that the graph of a function approaches but never intersects.

Hence, the correct option is B.

Learn more about Vertical Asymptotes:

brainly.com/question/2513623

#SPJ1

3 0
1 year ago
Jon ran 4 miles in 35<br> minutes. How long did it<br> take him to run a mile
sesenic [268]

Answer:

35/4 minutes per mile

Step-by-step explanation:

rate = time/distance, therefore the answer is 35/4

4 0
2 years ago
Which figure is the pre-image? Which figure is the image after the first transformation? Which figure is the image after the sec
Delvig [45]

Answer:

I believe the red one is the first image then the blue then the green because they show the prime sign

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is bigger miles or square miles
    6·2 answers
  • Find the volume of a cylinder with a radius of 2 and a length of 9
    6·1 answer
  • What is the value of x?<br> ANSWER ASAP!!
    15·1 answer
  • How much would 500$ invested at 9% interest compounded annually be worth after 4 years?
    13·1 answer
  • An investment that yielded 6% simple
    7·1 answer
  • Sole equation of red variable again. G= 1/6(w+ 40) w== red variable thanks
    8·1 answer
  • If line HC and line GD are parallel, which statement is true?
    11·1 answer
  • Please help... will be greatful!
    7·1 answer
  • -3(n + 4)= 9 what solution is n
    10·1 answer
  • Calculate work by parts. 5x2-23)​
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!