Answer:
True
Explanation:
In the Daubert case, The case is tainted because the defendant provided 'expert witness' to give testimony in the favor, but the testimonies that given contradict the common scientific knowledge that is held by scientific community. Even though this happen, the juries still rule in favor of the defendant simply because they brought 'an expert'.
To prevent this from happening again, the supreme court created rule 702 which restrict the type of expert testimonies that are admissible in court.
<span>The family studies are the type of study that would be most likely to compare unrelated siblings living in the same household.
</span>
<span>The goal of the family study is to obtain in-depth
information on middle class, dual-career families and to understand the complex dynamics of today's families and the
strategies they use to balance the demands of work and family.</span>
