<em>Would a prediction be accurate if the person about to act becomes aware of the prediction prior to the act itself? </em>
This is a classic problem of the deterministic approach to action. If psychology was perfect, it is likely that this would enable psychologists to predict how a person is going to act in any situation. It would also make psychologists able to predict when this act would take place. However, for such a prediction to be useful, the psychologist would have to keep this information from the subject. Otherwise, the knowledge of the prediction could potentially make the person act in a different way, rendering the prediction obsolete.
<em>Does the fact that a prediction can be known in advance disprove the possibility of predicting accurately or is that fact just one more antecedent condition? </em>
The fact that a prediction can be known in advance does disprove the possibility of predicting accurately. The moment a prediction is made, the prediction alters the state of the components that were necessary to know in order to make a prediction. Therefore, the prediction becomes obsolete as the action might or might not happen in the way that was previously predicted.
Answer:
B) Sheree's grandmother—a country woman through and through—knew how to bake a serious pie.
Explanation:
A dash (-) is often used to clearly define an independent clause. The dash is used to separate two words that have been connected together, as in peach and blue. Where there should be no pause between the sentences.
<u><em /></u><em>it is very simple but very important
1 they do not make spelling mistakes...
2 they have a strong grammar concept...
3 they stay away from plagiarism
4 they try to summarize whole topic to make it easy to understand
5 they try to write different topics in comparison... :)</em>
Answer:
The team "was" beautiful in "their" movements.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
