Poor resource management is one of many things that makes a business fail
Answer:
request a retrial if testimony is unclear
Answer:
The correct answer is B. Avoidance.
Explanation:
Avoidance is the act of eliminating one's exposure to risk or hazardous situations or objects.
Bev's route includes a dangerous area which can lead to serious consequences if she passes through it. By avoiding the area, she reduces the possible risks she might be exposing herself to, even if it adds minutes to her commute.
Answer:
Double denial results in a statement. In logic when you use a doble denial, it results as an afirmation.
Original sentence: <u>I have nothing.</u>
Negated sentence: <u>I don´t have nothing.</u>
Explanation:
In this sentece the word nothing helps us make the same sense in both sentences. I have nothing has the same meaning as the sentence: I don't have nothing. Both sentences mean the same but one of the has a denial.
Not having nothing is the same thing as having nothing.
Answer:
The correct option is E: regulating the use of bicycles mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and granted
Explanation:
In Option A has problems with parallelism. The "IT" before the granted made the sentence not to be parallel.
In Option B, the problem i find with this one is that there is no "and" before the granting. You cannot have a list in a sentence without an "and" before the last item on the list
Option C is also wrong because it is not parallel. Mandated cannot be parallel to "it granted". Same error as the first.
Option D is also wrong because it is incorrect to use "ing" forms as verb.
Option E: This eliminates all the errors from the previous options, hence is the correct option.
