Answer:
$14,333.33
Explanation:
Depreciation is the systematic allocation of the cost of an asset to P/l as a measure of use. It is added over the years as accumulated depreciation which is deducted from cost to get the net book value of the asset. Salvage value is the estimated realizable cost of an asset after its useful life.
Depreciation = (cost - salvage value)/useful life
Cost of an asset includes all cost incurred to make the asset available for use.
Depreciation = ($86000 + $7000 - $5000)/6
= $88000/6
= $14,333.33
Answer:
Units accounted for: 7,500
Explanation:
We are going to follow physical units so the method W/a or FIFO is not relevant for this step:
Beginning and transferred in are the input, fro mwere the units come from:
beginning WIP 4,500
transferred in 3,000
Units to account for: 7,500
While, ending WIP and transferred-out are were the untis are now:
Ending WIP 6,000
transferred-out 1,500
Units account for 7,500
Answer:
The subsidiary reports cost of goods sold at A. $660,000.
Explanation:
Cost of goods sold is the direct cost of producing or purchasing the goods sold by a business. The formula for cost of goods sold is as follows:
Cost of goods sold = Opening inventory + Purchases - Closing inventory
The subsidiary calculates its cost of goods sold as follows.
Opening inventory $120,000
Add: Purchases $720,000
Less: Closing inventory ($180,000)
Cost of goods sold $660,000
Therefore, the correct option is A. $660,000.
Answer:
No, because the second method has lower total costs of production.
Explanation:
In a bid to make profits businesses must always compare different processes and choose the cheapest one.
This will eventually reflect in the profitability of the business.
In this instance let's get the cost of each process.
Fabric costs $110 a bolt and labor costs $20 an hour.
The first dress maker can sew 400 garments with 100 bolts of fabric and 1,500 hours of labour
Total cost = (100 bolts * 110) + (1500 * 20)
Total cost = $41,000
For the second dress maker he can sew 400 garments with 150 bolts of fabric and 1,000 hours of identical labour
Total cost = (150 *110) + (1000 * 20)
Total cost = $36,500
As can be seen the second dressmaker has a lower cost of production so he is more efficient than the first dress maker
Answer:
Option D. The accountant was a member of a professional organization.
Explanation:
The reason is that for a successful claim under the negligence act, the claimant have to prove following three things:
- Duty of care existed between the relation
- She has suffered economic harm &
- The harm was proximately caused by the accountant's breach of the duty of care.
So the accountant's membership is not a valid requirement under the negligence act for a successful claim.
