Answer:
a positive incentive I think
Explanation:
Answer:
B. Cross-sectional data provides information about economic behavior at an instant in time, while time-series data provides information about how an economic variable behaves over time.
Explanation:
There are two types of data, transverse data and time series data. Cross-sectional data is data that exists at a single point in time. For example, data from an observational survey or sales from a firm. Time series data are data that require intertemporal analysis, such as a country's inflation and GDP data, which should be analyzed for evolution. In other words, time series data are analyzed in a manner dependent on the previous period. Current month's inflation depends on the previous month's inflation analysis.
The spread between the interest rates on bonds with default risk and default-free bonds is called the risk premium.
A default-free bond is a bond in which the bond issuer would not miss scheduled payments of either the coupon or principal. Bonds issued by the government are generally considered to be default-free. This is because the government can print money to make payments.
A bond with a default risk is a bond in which the bond issuer can miss scheduled payments of either the coupon or the principal. Bonds issued by private individuals are generally considered to be bonds with default risk.
Bondholders usually demand a compensation for holding bonds with a default risk. This compensation is known as risk premium.
Risk premium = return on bonds with default risk - return on default- free bond.
To learn more, please check: brainly.com/question/4304080?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
Part 1). Yes, Alex be better off in Paris if the relative prices between American and French meals (p_a/p_f) are lower in Paris than Austin because his capability to buying goods growths so his cash is fundamentally value more locally.
Part 2) No, Alex be better off in Paris if the relative prices between American and French meals (p_a/p_f) are higher in Paris than Austin because even though he can buying the same components, they will cost extra, and he will consume less goods than living in Austin
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question is incomplete because it does not attach the model to answer it we can comment on the following.
The problem is that Jamal, trying to increase profits, decided to sell two different products that are not part of the Subway products. When the franchisor visited Jamal's location, it realized the changes and set an ultimatum to Jamal to respect the franchise agreement.
The cause of the problem is that although Jamal wanted to diversify the products to have more income, this contradicts and is against the franchise agreement he signed when he bought the Subway franchise. The contract clearly states that the owner of the franchise can only sell products authorized in the contract by Subway. That is exactly one of the characteristics of a franchise. That you visit one of them any place in the world, and you are going to find de the same products with the same quality. That is the product guarantee of a franchise like Subway.
So the effects for the company are that its reputation an image can be questioned for selling different products that are hot approved by Subway. It is a major risk the company is not going to allow. Furthermore, it is stated in the contract. So Jamal has no right to break it.
One possible solution is that Jamal respects those 30 days to make the proper corrections, follow the guidelines established in the Subway's manuals, offer a sincere apology, and commit himself to operate the franchise just as it is stated on the agreement.
