Answer:
Option D is the correct option.
<em>please </em><em>see</em><em> the</em><em> attached</em><em> picture</em><em> for</em><em> full</em><em> solution</em><em>.</em><em>.</em>
<em>Hope</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>helps</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em>
<em>Good</em><em> </em><em>luck</em><em> on</em><em> your</em><em> assignment</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em>
No his work is not correct because 5.72 is larger than 5.27. so therefore you can not be correct
Answer:
b. Kathy
Step-by-step explanation:
We compare each of their score by how far away from the mean when in term of the standard deviation. Using the following formula
For John he is (85 - 75)/5 = 2.
For Kathy she is (80 - 50)/10 = 3.
Since Kathy is 3 standard deviation better than her class' average, while John is only 2's. We conclude that Kathy did better.
Answer:
This question doesn't really make sense...
Step-by-step explanation:
Please try to correct it.
Answer:
11 meters
Step-by-step explanation:
Lets say that w = width of the rectangle, to start. If the length of the rectangle is 3 meters greater than 2 times the width, the length of the rectangle is equal to 3 + 2w.
The perimeter of the rectangle is 2 * length of rectangle + 2 * width of the rectangle. With the perimeter being equal to 30 and width being w and length being 2w+3:
The perimeter of the rectangle is 2(w) + 2(2w+3) = 30.
We first need to find out w first, which will give us the width of the rectangle. Taking it step by step, we get:
2w + 4w + 6 = 30
6w + 6= 30
6w = 24 which is done by subtracting both sides by 6 to put the variables on one side and the values on the other side
w = 4 which is done by dividing 6 on both sides
Ultimately, this gets width to be 4 meters. Now that we found the width, we need to plug w = 4 into the equation we set up for length which is 2w+3.
That being said, the ANSWER is:
length of rectangle = 2(4)+3 = 11 meters
Hope this helps! :)
