<span>As indicated
by the article, Coca-Cola did not react quickly enough to alleviate and pacify
its purchasers that its Coke items are harmless and lawful. As indicated by
Coke's </span>social
responsibility commitments, the assertions of legislators spread quickly through India.
Nonetheless, the organization neglected to acknowledge how quick news went to.
Rather than looking to recover the trust and support from its clients, Coke
concentrated excessively on different workarounds. Coca-Cola shaped advisory groups
in India and the US. The advisory groups invested energy to run the tests, besides;
Coke was quiet to its shoppers. As specified by Mr. Seth, Coke's Indian
advertising expert, in the Indian culture, "Here individuals translate silence
as crime". Buyers needed to hear the official clarification from Coca-Cola
instantly and they would not like to hold up later. At long last, Coca-Cola
safeguarded their organization by claiming that different organizations have
comparative issues like Coke.
Answer:
An Indian Islamic kingdom that was tolerant toward Hindus C.
Explanation:
This makes no sense i need more details
I believe the answer is: B. <span>Mayflower Compact
The mayflower compact was a written agreement by ship passengers consisting of </span>separatist Puritans<span>, adventurers, and tradesmen.
The agreement stated that </span><span>"would use their own liberty; for none had power to command them."
According to this agreement their allegiance to a government would be determined by the majority votes including women and servants.</span>
The correct answer is sociologists should not conduct research on topics that may present sources of bias