Answer:
I've never heard of this, but, um, sure.
Explanation:
I don't think anyone should be charged for acting in self-defense. That's the only reason why the word "self-defense" exists, so it's our explanation for why we did something to a person physically after they did something first.
Stream-of-consciousness is a very stylistic form of free indirect discourse. It is not spontaneous, or unintentional, or anything of the sort. In fact, if anything, it's just the opposite. It's highly stylized, but also purposeful and calculating. It sees the world wholly through the character's mind instead of through their senses, save for how the mind and the senses interact.
It relates to a lot of things - free association, synesthesia, free indirect discourse, without actually being any of them.
<span>There's only a handful of writers that can actually do stream-of-consciousness writing with any success - Joyce and Faulkner come to mind immediately. In short, there's nothing wrong with trying it, but there's also nothing wrong with not having done that, but having done, say, free association instead.</span>
Answer:
A) healthy diets the world over
Explanation:
In B, the word <em>women</em> narrows down the topic, and so do the words <em>factors</em> in C and<em> fiber</em> and <em>men's</em> in D.
Healthy diets the world over is the broadest topic of all.
Answer:
the result is not poetry, nor till the poets among us can be "literalists of the imagination" —above insolence and triviality and can present