Political scientists have generally found that justices' decisions are most closely tied to<u> </u><u>their political ideologies.</u>
It is a frequent misconception that Supreme Court justices' voting decisions primarily reflect their beliefs, principles, or personal policy preferences.
However, this supposition has never been sufficiently verified using objective assessments of the ideological beliefs of the justices, that is, assessments that are not based on their votes on the Court.
We derive independent and trustworthy measures of the values of every Supreme Court justice from Earl Warren to Anthony Kennedy using content analytic approaches.
The attitudinal paradigm is firmly supported by the close correlation between these values and the justices' votes.
To learn more about Political Scientists here
brainly.com/question/10369837
#SPJ4
Answer: interpreting a person's behavior in comparison to others recently encountered
Explanation: halo effect is the tendency for an impression created in one area to influence opinion in another area.
After doing research and finding the graphic described above, the state that uses the process is Utah. The correct answer is C.
The Senate and the House of Representatives are different because the Senate has the filibuster, where one member can block all activity, and the Senate has a rule that if 60 members agree, debate is stopped and the bill is voted on. The House of Representatives will give each side an equal amount of time for debate before voting on a bill.
I think It was Beorn? I'm not sure.
