Answer:
We are living in the age of digital communication. At all times we see the launch of more technological devices, with more efficient connection networks that allow us to establish communication with anyone anywhere in the world who has access to this type of technology and the best, we can do this without leaving home .
This context seems to establish a perfect reality, where communication is increasingly efficient, but it is not quite so. At least not in the opinion of Sherry Turkle, who believes that in the best place for our communication, technology is destroying it.
In his article "The Flight from Conversation," Turkle states that technology is promoting the loss of the ability to socialize and establish a face-to-face conversation, where it is difficult to hide our real feelings, or "make up" our personality. The expensive conversation the face emits a certain vulnerability that the virtual conversation does not and therefore it is preferable
Turkle uses logical resources to show that disengagement is also an important factor in this situation, because we can be close to people with our goals, but at the same time away, because we don’t need to be close to talking to them, we don’t need to answer communication between them.
Turkle uses clear and direct words, so that anyone can conclude that as technology evolves, communication becomes more artificial and rare, with no real personal connection between individuals.
cask
a barrellike container made os wood,plastic,
avenge
inflict harm in return for(oneself or another)
preclude
prevent from happening
impunity
exemption from punish,emt or freed from consequences of the action
retribution
punishment inflicted on someone else
accost
approach and address
motley
desperate
impose
forced or to be put in place
insufferable
to extreme to bear; in tolerable
abscond
leave hurriedly and secretly
explicit
stated clearly and in detail
repose
a state of reast (sleep)
rampant
(something unwelcomed)
recess
attach (a fixture) by setting it back
imposter
a person who pretends to be someone else
i think this is right
Vanquished means to be conquered or defeated, so it is B. You could say the ememy has been vanquished or conquered.
Rama came to marry Sita when A.) He strung a bow that no other man could and won Sita's hand. Hence option A) is correct answer.
<h3>How did Rama get to marry Sita?</h3>
According to the Ramayana, Lord Shiva had gifted a celestial bow to King Janaka of Mithila and also King Janaka set the condition that he would get his daughter Sita married to the person who would be able to string Pinaka which is the bow of Lord Shiva. No worthy suitor had come by to Mithila to claim his daughter.
When Janaka made the announcement, hundreds of kings, princes and even extraterrestrial personalities tried lifting the bow in the hope of marrying the lotus-eyed princess.
When Finally Rama was able to complete this task, then he married Sita.
To know more about Ramayana, refer
brainly.com/question/11266373
#SPJ1
Note: The given question is incomplete on the portal. Here is the complete question.
Question: Which of the following most closely describes how Ráma came to marry Sítá
A. He strung a bow that no other man could and won Sítás hand
B. He gave her a large ring with a gem on it and she accepted his offer.
C. He rescued her from kidnappers who were trying to use her for ransom
D. He ruined her reputation by kissing her and so he was forced to marry her.
