Real estate experts should not provide advice
on tax implications. this is because to offer such an advice the expert need training and knowlidge on state and federal tax laws. Tax laws are complex and varies from state to state which requires a considerable high level training. ina ddition, the laws keep on changing as new budgets are read,and the expert may not be conversant with any change.
Answer:
The answer is: $90,000
Explanation:
We must first determine the cost of goods sold:
- COGS = variable costs = 70% x 1,000,000
I will assume all fixed costs are operating expenses.
Then we elaborate a simple income statement:
Sales $1,000,000
<u>COGS ($700,000) </u>
Gross profit $300,000
<u>Operating expenses ($210,000) </u>
Operating profit $90,000
Answer:
The answer is: the following three should be used.
- net present value (NPV)
- traditional payback period (PB)
- the modified internal rate of return (MIRR)
Explanation:
First of all, the NPV of the four projects must be positive. Only NPV positive projects should be financed. If the NPV is negative, the project should be tossed away. This is like a golden rule in investment.
Now comes the "if" part. What does the company value more, a short payback period or a higher rate of return.
If the company values more a shorter payback period (usually high tech companies do this due to obsolescence), then they should choose the project with the shortest payback period.
If the company isn't that concerned about payback periods, then it should choose to finance the project with the highest modified rate of return. This means that the most profitable project should be financed.
