A group of highly mobile foragers, such as the Netsilik of Canada or Ju/'hoansi, who openly share with each other and in which all men can do what other men can do, just as all women can do what other women can do, would very likely be a(n) <u>Egalitarian society</u>
<u>Egalitarian society</u>
- In an egalitarian society, all are considered equal, regardless of gender, race, religion, or age. There is not a class system in an egalitarian society but relatively equal access to income and wealth.
- Egalitarianism is the equal treatment of all in society no matter their gender, age, race, or beliefs. One example of a proponent of egalitarianism is Martin Luther King Jr who advocated for civil rights in America
<h3><u>What is the opposite of egalitarianism?</u></h3>
- The opposite of egalitarianism is elitism, which is the belief that certain people have a right to have their opinions heard more than others. Definitions of egalitarianism.
To know more about egalitarian society, check the links.
brainly.com/question/1036493
brainly.com/question/1013360
#SPJ4
Answer:
Democracy is form of government in which the power is vested in the hands of the people. The people have the right to choose their governing legislature and they also have the power to change them. Democracy provides an environment that respects human rights and fundamental freedoms, and in which the freely expressed will of people is exercised.
The Missouri Compromise was a compromise between people that wanted slaves and didn't so that there was supposedly an equal amount of slave states and anti-slave states in the union. Missouri was admitted into the union as a slave state and Maine was admitted into the union as a free state. So, Missouri and Maine.
Answer:
Anchoring
Explanation:
The anchor may be explained as the first piece of information which an individual has access to. This anchor, or information, hence affects the decision made by the individual as they rely so heavily on it no matter the level or degree of veracity of the information. The anchor may be seen as a particular reference point over which a the person uses as a benchmark for his belief on certain issues. For instance, a person might had an initial information on a particular subject. This information might be adopted by the person as an anchor such that he relies so heavily on it no matter how false it may seem.
