The Mughals did not follow any law of succession like the law of primogeniture. Consequently, each time a ruler died, a war of succession between the brothers for the throne started. This weakened the Mughal Empire, especially after Aurangzeb. It is generally believed by the historians that one of the major causes of the decline of the Mughal empire was the policy of conflict followed by Aurangzeb with the Rajput’s.
Assuming you mean "undeveloped countries", then the <span>industry in developed countries compares favorable to that of undeveloped countries, since develop countries almost always tend to have more modern and thriving economies. </span>
A and B, they pillaged and traded with other countries throughout the course of history, and in order to do this they needed to travel by water given that trees were readily available to make boats. This helped them survive throughout history.
Survival of the fittest will survive
Answer:
no the U.S. should not have colonies as it can shatter unity all the colonies will do their own thing and can lead to bad thing.
wars will take place more often between the colonies for particular things like a mines.
this could create mass wars and death.
if they had to fight a war they would all be defeated easily and each colonies will do what they feel is right.
if colonies are made in the U.S. it can lead to mostly bad thing. Thus U.S. should not have even a single colony
